Skip to content

ci: Added workflow for checking broken links in Markdown files#207

Merged
Roopan-Microsoft merged 1 commit intomainfrom
psl-broken-link-checker
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

ci: Added workflow for checking broken links in Markdown files#207
Roopan-Microsoft merged 1 commit intomainfrom
psl-broken-link-checker

Conversation

@Vamshi-Microsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

This pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate the process of checking for broken links in Markdown files. The workflow is triggered either on pull requests or manually via workflow dispatch.

New Workflow for Broken Link Checking:

  • .github/workflows/broken-links-checker.yml: Introduced a workflow named "Broken Link Checker" that uses the lychee-action to validate links in Markdown files. It checks only changed files for pull requests and all Markdown files for manual triggers.* ...

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Golden Path Validation

  • I have tested the primary workflows (the "golden path") to ensure they function correctly without errors.

Deployment Validation

  • I have validated the deployment process successfully and all services are running as expected with this change.

What to Check

Verify that the following are valid

  • ...

Other Information

@Vamshi-Microsoft Vamshi-Microsoft changed the title feat: Add Broken Link Checker workflow for Markdown files ci: Added workflow for checking broken links in Markdown files Jul 8, 2025
@Roopan-Microsoft Roopan-Microsoft merged commit 5d2e83d into main Jul 8, 2025
6 checks passed
@Roopan-Microsoft Roopan-Microsoft deleted the psl-broken-link-checker branch July 8, 2025 12:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.8.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants