-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
Use separate vsixmanifest files for Component and Standalone deployments #909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
/azp run |
|
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
Scottj1s
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for taking this on!
| <Tags>WinRT, C++, cppwinrt, native</Tags> | ||
| </Metadata> | ||
| <Installation AllUsers="true"> | ||
| <InstallationTarget Id="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Community" Version="[15.0,17.0)" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just curious, will this line, as written, block on 17.1, 17.2, etc.? If so, is that intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line will actually block starting on 17.0 and up. I didn't write this line originally, but I imagine it was intentional, with the thinking being that we'd want to actually test this extension on 17.0 first. This seems like a good decision, especially in light of some upcoming changes to VS 17.
We need to remove the dependency on
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Component.CoreEditorfor the "Component" VSIX, but want to keep this dependency for the "Standalone" VSIX.This change forks the
source.extension.vsixmanifestfile into "Component" and "Standalone" flavors.