-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
flowey: split openvmm-deps into separate archives and use Linux 6.18 test kernel #3530
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
ef10d04
2e275c4
3aea3ee
690899a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -21,13 +21,10 @@ use std::collections::BTreeSet; | |
|
|
||
| /// Which Linux test kernel version to fetch from the openvmm-deps GitHub | ||
| /// release. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// The `openvmm-deps` release currently only ships the 6.1 kernel; additional | ||
| /// kernel lines (e.g. 6.6, 6.12) are intended to be added as purely additive | ||
| /// follow-ups, both upstream and as new variants of this enum. | ||
| #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)] | ||
| pub enum LinuxTestKernelVersion { | ||
| Linux6_1, | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess this is more a maintainer question than a question for this PR, but do we still want to use 6.1 for anything or can we just delete it?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It looks like we have one test that is not working with the 6.18 kernel. Looking at the lift to have that one test using the prior kernel version
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I personally would be ok with deleting 6.1 entirely and marking that one test as unstable to get this in, but let's check with some mana folks first to see if they think it would be an easy fix. Either way I think 6.1 should go away. |
||
| Linux6_18, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl LinuxTestKernelVersion { | ||
|
|
@@ -36,6 +33,7 @@ impl LinuxTestKernelVersion { | |
| pub fn artifact_tag(self) -> &'static str { | ||
| match self { | ||
| Self::Linux6_1 => "6.1", | ||
| Self::Linux6_18 => "6.18", | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -73,7 +71,7 @@ impl OpenvmmTestKernelFile { | |
| /// The default Linux test kernel version. Call sites that don't otherwise care | ||
| /// which kernel they're using should pass this. | ||
| pub const DEFAULT_LINUX_TEST_KERNEL_VERSION: LinuxTestKernelVersion = | ||
| LinuxTestKernelVersion::Linux6_1; | ||
| LinuxTestKernelVersion::Linux6_18; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| flowey_config! { | ||
| /// Config for the resolve_openvmm_test_linux_kernel node. | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.