Remove AI generated and outdated docs #15370
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
acoates-ms
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2025
dannyvv
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2025
anupriya13
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2025
This was referenced Dec 28, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove AI generated docs that do not make sense.
The RNW Docs folder should have documents that are useful to RNW developers and its users.
I have found several documents in our docs folder that look like AI spill out rather than something that can be useful.
We all enjoy using Copilot and it is a huge help, but it is the developers responsibility to produce quality content in the end.
This PR deletes these documents as they make no sense and I bet was never read by anyone:
If we need any documents like this, then please write them with a purpose of being useful and readable.
This document is deleted as its information is now quite outdated:
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow