High Performance Plan check - change wording for clarity#1423
Merged
uc-msft merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom Oct 4, 2025
Merged
High Performance Plan check - change wording for clarity#1423uc-msft merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
uc-msft merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
Conversation
Just looking at the display name makes it seem like the server is already in high performance mode and that is the issues. The wording on the other checks includes should and I think this would make it clearer.
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @uc-msft thanks for merging - can you clarify the process for this updating the SQL Assessment API? At the moment it still shows the old wording: Thanks |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just looking at the display name makes it seem like the server is already in high performance mode and that is the issues. The wording on the other checks includes should and I think this would make it clearer.