Add slight clairification to ChatParticipant in content provider API#300903
Merged
mjbvz merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom Mar 16, 2026
Merged
Add slight clairification to ChatParticipant in content provider API#300903mjbvz merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
mjbvz merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.
hediet
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2026
TylerLeonhardt
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2026
Collaborator
Author
|
Merging this but doesn't need to be taken in 1.112 imo since it's just a doc fix for a proposed api |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just clarifying the expected behavior since there was some confusion
@TylerLeonhardt @rebornix @DonJayamanne: longer term I think the story we want is:
The extension defines a top level chat participant (called something like
@claude). This is what is used for delegating from an existing chat to a new session.It would be expected to stream out a response, ending with a link to the new session
The default chat participant for sessions of a given type. This is the participant passed into
registerChatSessionContentProvider. It's not something you could directly@mention