-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.7k
fix: guard setDimensions against disposed ptyProcessReady (fixes #315282) #315284
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
vs-code-engineering
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/terminal-setdimensions-disposed-guard-8d0f1a436b058723
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+3
β0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this new error from your recently merged PR?
Please, it would be good to have repro step and have you confirm that this resolves it.
This reads like startup state and silently resolving resize could hide real lifecycle bug.
Maybe there is something going on in debouncer with updatePtyDimension, and we should make sure that doesn't get invoked after disposable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review. To clarify the race condition:
TerminalResizeDebounceralready guards against disposal (this._store.isDisposedcheck at line 36 ofterminalResizeDebouncer.ts), and_updatePtyDimensionsinterminalInstance.tsguards withthis.isDisposed(line 2059).ptyProcessReadyis nulled (line 582β584) during its own disposal handler, while the terminal instance hasn't fully disposed yet β so both the debouncer and_updatePtyDimensionsguards pass.That said, the reviewer's concern about whether this masks a deeper lifecycle ordering issue is valid and warrants input from
@bryanchen-d(the assignee and author of the culprit PR #314795). Deferring to humans on whether a broader fix to the disposal ordering is preferred over this defensive guard.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an error from a different path, similar to the xterm issue but stack is different.
Also the race condition is hard to repro from what I am trying. In terms of my understanding of the sequence, in a brief mental model, it is like:
Based on that, if we want to fix the sequencing here, we may want to dispose the debouncher before calling
processManager.dispose()so it won't lead to the error.