Skip to content

Conversation

@MIchaelMainer
Copy link
Contributor

Capture current policy state so that we can make versioned changes to branch protection policies. This will enable policy history, auditing, review, standardization, and templatization. We will update policy in later PR.

We can ignore the rule that states: At least one value under RequiredStatusChecks must be specified when RequiresStrictStatusChecks is true. or RequiresStrictStatusChecks must be true when specifying RequiredStatusChecks. This is getting removed. This is getting removed.

This branch protection policy will not take effect until https://github.com/microsoftgraph/.github/blob/main/policies/branch-protection-sdks.yml has been removed.

@MIchaelMainer MIchaelMainer requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2023 18:25
Capture current policy state so that we can make versioned changes to branch protection policies. This will enable policy history, auditing, review, standardization, and templatization. We will update policy in later PR.

We can ignore the rule that states: `At least one value under RequiredStatusChecks must be specified when RequiresStrictStatusChecks is true.` or `RequiresStrictStatusChecks must be true when specifying RequiredStatusChecks.` This is getting removed. This is getting removed.
* https://github.com/microsoft/GitOps.Branches/pull/73
* https://github.com/microsoft/GitOps.Branches/issues/72

This branch protection policy will not take effect until https://github.com/microsoftgraph/.github/blob/main/policies/branch-protection-sdks.yml has been removed.
@rkodev rkodev force-pushed the branchprotectionpolicy branch from d000075 to 96a29d4 Compare August 14, 2023 06:35
@rkodev rkodev enabled auto-merge (squash) August 14, 2023 06:37
@rkodev rkodev merged commit f3672bf into dev Aug 14, 2023
@rkodev rkodev deleted the branchprotectionpolicy branch August 14, 2023 06:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants