Test coverage#143
Merged
mercyblitz merged 18 commits intomainfrom Apr 26, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Test coverage
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR improves test coverage by refactoring existing test classes to extend from AbstractJavaTypeTest and AbstractJavaTypeKindTest, and by adding new test methods to verify additional type behaviors.
- Replaces BaseJavaTypeTest with AbstractJavaTypeTest across several test classes.
- Updates test invocations in JavaTypeTest.java to use the new AbstractJavaTypeTest methods and adds new tests for JavaTypeKind.
- Refactors ProcessExecutor to use isNotEmpty for checking options.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 17 out of 17 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| microsphere-java-core/src/test/java/io/microsphere/reflect/JavaTypeTestFor* | Updated test classes to extend AbstractJavaTypeTest instead of BaseJavaTypeTest. |
| microsphere-java-core/src/test/java/io/microsphere/reflect/JavaTypeTest.java | Replaced testBaseJavaTypeTest with testAbstractJavaTypeTest and added new test methods for type kind. |
| microsphere-java-core/src/test/java/io/microsphere/reflect/AbstractJavaTypeTest.java | Renamed class and updated resolveType() to use AbstractJavaTypeTest. |
| microsphere-java-core/src/test/java/io/microsphere/reflect/AbstractJavaTypeKindTest.java | Introduced a new abstract base for JavaTypeKind tests. |
| microsphere-java-core/src/main/java/io/microsphere/process/ProcessExecutor.java | Replaced null-check of options with a call to isNotEmpty for cleaner code. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
microsphere-java-core/src/test/java/io/microsphere/reflect/JavaTypeTest.java:109
- Ensure that all test invocations have been updated to use testAbstractJavaTypeTest consistently, and consider adding more assertions within the newly added type kind tests to fully validate the behavior of each type category.
testAbstractJavaTypeTest(JavaTypeTestForClass.class);
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.