User feedback 4-10-2026

[ethanpalm]

Documentation changes

Resolve recent user feedback comments

---

For Reviewers

When reviewing documentation PRs, please consider:

✅ Technical accuracy

• Code examples work as written
• Commands and configurations are correct
• Links resolve to the right destinations
• Prerequisites and requirements are accurate

✅ Clarity and completeness

• Instructions are clear and easy to follow
• Steps are in logical order
• Nothing important is missing
• Examples help illustrate the concepts

✅ User experience

• A new user could follow these docs successfully
• Common gotchas or edge cases are addressed
• Error messages or troubleshooting guidance is helpful

---

Note

Low Risk
Low risk documentation-only changes that clarify behavior and update examples, with no impact to runtime code paths.

Overview
Clarifies the Broken links CI check docs by explicitly limiting it to internal links and pointing readers to the PR Checks tab for detailed results.

Adds a note in SEO docs to verify canonical URL behavior on deployed sites since local builds can introduce /src/_props URL artifacts.

Updates the docs.json minimal configuration example to show navigation.groups nested under a navigation object instead of a top-level array.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit e835964. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[mintlify-development]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
userauth	🟡 Building	–	Apr 10, 2026, 9:58 PM

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
mintlify	🟡 Building	–	Apr 10, 2026, 9:58 PM