Skip to content

Conversation

@a-akimov
Copy link
Contributor

@a-akimov a-akimov commented Oct 5, 2025

Motivation and Context

The version field is returned in many places, so it would be good to have a description. I propose to start with a basic one, since we don't mandate whether it should be semver, or date-based or any other types of versioning. (as far as I know)

How Has This Been Tested?

Locally.

Breaking Changes

No.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Was originally in this PR

@a-akimov a-akimov requested a review from a team as a code owner October 5, 2025 14:57
@a-akimov a-akimov requested a review from a team October 5, 2025 15:00
pja-ant
pja-ant previously approved these changes Oct 6, 2025
@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner enabled auto-merge (squash) October 7, 2025 16:22
jonathanhefner
jonathanhefner previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 25, 2025 07:29

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@a-akimov a-akimov dismissed stale reviews from jonathanhefner and pja-ant via c2165ec October 25, 2025 07:29
@a-akimov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pja-ant @jonathanhefner thank you for approving. There was a merge conflict on this PR, I resolved it but now it requires your blessing once again.

@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner enabled auto-merge (squash) October 27, 2025 12:01
jonathanhefner
jonathanhefner previously approved these changes Oct 27, 2025
@localden
Copy link
Contributor

@a-akimov - mind resolving the conflict once more?

@a-akimov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@a-akimov - mind resolving the conflict once more?

@localden done! Thank you for looking into this.

@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner merged commit e16fd35 into modelcontextprotocol:main Jan 26, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants