[Schema] Refactor the schema tool array to use normalizeSchemaProperties method #223
+21
−8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bigdevlarry
requested review from
CodeWithKyrian,
Nyholm and
chr-hertel
as code owners
Member
|
Currently still blocked, see
|
chr-hertel
added
Server
chr-hertel
changed the title
bigdevlarry
force-pushed
the
refactor-schema-tool-from-array-method
branch
from
f71fc7c to
9b5abb4
Compare
bigdevlarry
force-pushed
the
refactor-schema-tool-from-array-method
branch
from
9b5abb4 to
3fca8a5
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@chr-hertel thanks for flagging, switched my pc. Resolved now :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was a refactor idea resolved on an earlier output schema change work that got merged PR #153. More of a follow up to clean up the duplicate lines
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
No, not a breaking change
Types of changes
Checklist
Additional context