Update SearXNG MCP Link

[nitish-raj]

Replacing SearXNG MCP with an active development

Description

Server Details

• Server:
• Changes to:

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Documentation update

Checklist

• I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
• My changes follows MCP security best practices
• I have updated the server's README accordingly
• I have tested this with an LLM client
• My code follows the repository's style guidelines
• New and existing tests pass locally
• I have added appropriate error handling
• I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

Additional context

[Technetium1]

These are both active, why replace?

[Technetium1]

@ihor-sokoliuk what is the status of your project? #403

[ihor-sokoliuk]

@Technetium1 My project is actively developing. I respond to all issues, review all pull requests (PRs), and implement new features. I'm not sure why the PR's author is replacing mine.