Update release notes for beta.2#2592
Conversation
a5442a1 to
73eb5d9
Compare
|
Sorry nearly impossible to track changes that late after a long day. Tomorrow I'm travelling, you might add other reviewers. |
|
Why are we using font "Arial" in the HTML code? I suppose, the HTML editor of Dymola is inserting this, but maybe I am wrong... However, I think we should rather avoid "Arial" -- which I am not using anyways, as Linux user -- and we should avoid any other font name and leave this up the HTML engine. I will have a look at the content around 10-11 this morning. |
Indeed, it is generated by running ModelManagement.Compare.compareModels in Dymola on Windows. That is also how it is in MSL v3.2.2, see e.g., https://doc.modelica.org/Resources/Documentation/Version-3.2.2/Differences322To321Build4.html. |
* list of resolved GitHub issues (including pull requests) generated by `python Generate-ReleaseNotes.py`
* comparison table between v3.2.3 and v3.2.2 generated by `ModelManagement.Compare.compareModels("Modelica323", "Modelica 3.2.3", "Modelica322", "Modelica 3.2.2", "DifferencesTo322.html", true)`
73eb5d9 to
11f7f0a
Compare
sjoelund
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ResolvedGutHubIssues.html is a valid html-file with a valid doctype. DifferencesTo322.html however lacks a DOCTYPE and is neither a valid HTML4 or HTML5 document; it doesn't close HTML entities, messes up table tags a lot, etc... But I guess we can't do much about that.
@HansOlsson or @StephanZiegler might take on improving the HTML validity of ModelManagement.Compare.compareModels in Dymola. |
python Generate-ReleaseNotes.pyModelManagement.Compare.compareModels("Modelica323", "Modelica 3.2.3", "Modelica322", "Modelica 3.2.2", "DifferencesTo322.html", true)