-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 434
fix: flaky test case #747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: flaky test case #747
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @suluyana, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses and resolves flakiness in several test cases by refining the test setup and execution logic. It removes arbitrary Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix flaky tests by removing time.sleep calls and adding a server warm-up in a setUp method. While the approach is sound, I've identified a critical issue in the new setUp method in tests/llm/test_anthropic.py where a configuration object is used before it's defined, which will cause tests to fail. Additionally, I've noted a potential resource leak in tests/memory/test_default_memory.py from a removed client cleanup call and a minor style issue with import placement. Addressing these points will improve the robustness and quality of the tests.
No description provided.