[doc] correct the formula for DAPO soft-overlong #5557
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hjh0119, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on correcting a mathematical formula and its accompanying description within the documentation for DAPO's soft-overlong length penalty function. The changes ensure that the documented formula accurately reflects the intended calculation, improving the precision and reliability of the technical information provided.
Highlights
- Formula Correction: The piecewise formula for R_length(L) in the DAPO documentation has been updated.
- Condition Adjustment: The conditions for the three cases in the R_length(L) formula have been revised to reflect the correct ranges.
- Formula Term Update: The specific expression for the second case of the R_length(L) formula has been corrected.
- Descriptive Text Alignment: The accompanying descriptive text explaining the formula's behavior has been updated to match the corrected formula.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hjh0119, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the accuracy of the documentation for DAPO's soft-overlong length penalty function. It addresses an incorrect mathematical formula and its corresponding explanation, ensuring that the technical details presented are precise and consistent across both the Chinese and English versions of the documentation.
Highlights
- Formula Correction: The mathematical formula for R_length(L) in the DAPO soft-overlong documentation has been updated to reflect the correct conditions and expression for the length penalty function.
- Textual Clarification: The accompanying textual explanation describing the length penalty function's behavior has been revised in both Chinese and English documentation files to align with the corrected formula.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the documentation for the DAPO soft-overlong length penalty function in both Chinese and English versions. The formula and its corresponding description have been corrected to reflect the intended behavior. The changes appear to be accurate and consistent. I've added a couple of minor suggestions to improve the stylistic consistency of the LaTeX formula.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the documentation for the DAPO soft-overlong penalty function in both the Chinese and English versions. The formula and its description have been corrected to accurately reflect its behavior. The changes appear correct and improve the clarity of the documentation. I've added a couple of minor suggestions to improve formatting consistency in the formulas.
3 participants
PR type
PR information
Write the detail information belongs to this PR.
Experiment results
Paste your experiment result here(if needed).