Skip to content

Conversation

@hjh0119
Copy link
Collaborator

@hjh0119 hjh0119 commented Sep 2, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hjh0119, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical bug in the GRPO trainer related to asynchronous generation in a distributed setting. It refines how output data is managed and merged across different processes, particularly ensuring that non-main processes correctly handle their output states without causing errors, thereby stabilizing the asynchronous generation workflow.

Highlights

  • Asynchronous Generation Output Handling: Corrected the assignment of 'outputs' to 'all_outputs' for non-main processes within the '_server_rollout' function, ensuring proper data flow in distributed environments.
  • Distributed Output Merging Logic: Introduced a conditional check in 'merge_output_input_data' to immediately return empty outputs for non-main processes when 'async_generate' is enabled, preventing assertion failures and correctly handling distributed asynchronous generation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces two important fixes for the asynchronous generation feature in the GRPO trainer. The first change corrects a variable name in _server_rollout, preventing a NameError. The second change adds a necessary check in _postprocess_rollout_outputs to handle cases where non-main processes receive empty outputs during distributed asynchronous generation, thus avoiding an assertion failure. Both changes are correct and improve the robustness of the async generation functionality.

@hjh0119 hjh0119 merged commit e0d9424 into modelscope:main Sep 2, 2025
2 checks passed
@hjh0119 hjh0119 deleted the fix-ag branch September 2, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants