Skip to content

Conversation

@Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug within the mcore-bridge component, specifically in the _convert function responsible for model conversion. The core of the fix involves refactoring the layer iteration mechanism from a standard for loop to a while loop, coupled with manual management of the layer index and progress bar updates. This ensures that the conversion process accurately reflects progress and correctly handles scenarios where certain layers might be skipped, particularly in configurations involving Virtual Pipeline Parallelism.

Highlights

  • Loop Refactoring: The layer iteration in the _convert method has been refactored from a for loop to a while loop to provide more granular control over the iteration process.
  • Progress Bar Management: Manual incrementing of layer_idx and explicit tqdm progress bar updates have been introduced to ensure accurate tracking, especially in scenarios where layers might be skipped.
  • VPP Compatibility: The changes improve compatibility with Virtual Pipeline Parallelism (VPP) by correctly handling layer indexing and progress updates in distributed environments, addressing potential issues with skipped layers.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors a for loop into a while loop to correctly handle virtual pipeline parallelism (VPP) in the mcore-bridge. The change to a while loop is necessary for the complex control flow required by VPP, especially for retrying a layer index with a new model chunk. The implementation is functionally correct. I've added a suggestion to refactor the loop body to improve readability and remove minor code duplication.

@Jintao-Huang Jintao-Huang merged commit d41e446 into modelscope:main Nov 13, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Jintao-Huang added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2025
vx120 pushed a commit to vx120/ms-swift that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants