Skip to content

Conversation

@junpataleta
Copy link
Contributor

With the ubuntu-latest now using noble numbat, the kcov package seems no longer available, so tests that require it are now failing. I'm not sure what the alternate would be, but pinning runs that require kcov to use ubuntu-jammy may be a quick fix until we find more time to look into it.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 31.88%. Comparing base (c687fa9) to head (aef3a7d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #331      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   33.12%   31.88%   -1.25%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        3215     3215              
==========================================
- Hits         1065     1025      -40     
- Misses       2150     2190      +40     
Flag Coverage Δ
check_upgrade_savepoints 0.46% <ø> (ø)
checkstyle_manipulations 0.00% <ø> (ø)
compare_databases 2.39% <ø> (ø)
continuous_manage_queues_validation 0.71% <ø> (ø)
define_excluded 1.11% <ø> (ø)
detect_conflicts 1.49% <ø> (ø)
diff_extract_changes 0.00% <ø> (ø)
git_sync_two_branches 2.05% <ø> (ø)
grunt_process 3.01% <ø> (ø)
illegal_whitespace 2.64% <ø> (ø)
list_valid_components 0.00% <ø> (ø)
mustache_lint 2.83% <ø> (ø)
mustache_lint_plugins 1.30% <ø> (ø)
php_lint 1.21% <ø> (ø)
prepare_npm_stuff 1.52% <ø> (ø)
remote_branch_checker 17.48% <ø> (ø)
remote_branch_reporter 0.00% <ø> (ø)
setup 0.00% <ø> (ø)
thirdparty_check 1.46% <ø> (ø)
travis-branch-checker 0.00% <ø> (ø)
upgrade_external_backup 1.61% <ø> (ø)
verifications 0.00% <ø> (ø)
verify_commit_messages 2.64% <ø> (ø)
verify_phpunit_xml ?
versions_check_set 5.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@paulholden
Copy link
Member

Is this a duplicate of #328 ?

@junpataleta
Copy link
Contributor Author

@paulholden Indeed it is, and I didn't notice. I just merged it. Closing this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants