Skip to content

Conversation

@kixelated
Copy link
Collaborator

My use case is that a user should be able to get announcements for their favorite channels, not the entire world. This required a BREAKING auth change because the existing "sub" field in the token actually has meaning in JWT, and needs to be a string.

I also took another stab at Path. It's nicer now... except lifetimes can be a pain. I couldn't figure out how to get serde deserialize because of lifetimes so I'm using strings for now.

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Claude finished @kixelated's task —— View job


Code Review Complete 👍

After reviewing this PR for bugs and security issues, I found one critical security issue that should be addressed:

🚨 Critical Issue: Panic-based DoS vulnerability

Location: rs/moq-relay/src/auth.rs:91-93

let suffix = root
    .strip_prefix(&claims.root)
    .context("path does not match the root")?;

Problem: The code calls strip_prefix() but expects it to return None when there's no match. However, strip_prefix() can panic in some edge cases with malformed paths, potentially causing a DoS attack.

Impact: An attacker could craft specific URL paths that cause the relay to panic and crash.

Recommendation: Add proper validation before calling strip_prefix() or use a safer alternative that handles all edge cases gracefully.


✅ Positive Security Observations:

  • JWT implementation correctly avoids using "sub" field (per JWT standards)
  • Proper token expiration validation in place
  • Authentication logic properly scoped to authorized paths
  • Good separation between cluster and non-cluster permissions
  • Path normalization in the new Path implementation prevents common traversal issues

✅ Code Quality:

  • Breaking changes are well-documented and necessary for JWT compliance
  • Comprehensive test coverage for the new authentication logic
  • The new Path implementation with lifetime handling is a solid improvement

Overall Assessment: Good security-focused refactor with one critical fix needed. The architecture changes properly implement the multi-path authorization requirement while maintaining security boundaries.

@kixelated kixelated enabled auto-merge (squash) August 12, 2025 23:36
@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Claude finished @kixelated's task —— View job


Code Review Complete 👍

Review Tasks

  • Examine JWT token claims changes for security issues
  • Review new Path implementation for potential vulnerabilities
  • Check authentication/authorization logic in relay
  • Look for common security patterns and potential DoS vectors
  • Review overall code quality and potential bugs

After a thorough security review of this PR, I found no critical security issues. Here's my assessment:

✅ Security Assessment: GOOD

JWT Implementation Changes:

  • ✅ Correctly avoids using "sub" field per JWT standards (line 55 in claims.rs)
  • ✅ Proper token expiration validation is in place
  • ✅ Authentication logic properly scoped to authorized paths
  • ✅ Good separation between cluster and non-cluster permissions

Path Implementation Security:

  • ✅ The new Path implementation properly handles normalization and prevents common path traversal issues
  • strip_prefix() method safely returns Option<Path> - no panic risk as I initially thought
  • ✅ Path trimming and multiple slash collapse prevents bypass attempts

Authentication Flow:

  • ✅ Proper error handling in auth.rs:91-93 - the code correctly uses Option return from strip_prefix()
  • ✅ No dangerous unwrap() calls in security-critical paths (connection.rs lines 38,48 are safe as they use validated tokens)

✅ Code Quality Observations:

Breaking Changes:

  • Well-documented and necessary for JWT compliance
  • The move from "sub" to proper array-based authorization is architecturally sound

Test Coverage:

  • Comprehensive test coverage for new authentication logic
  • Good edge case testing for path operations

Architecture:

  • The new multi-path authorization properly implements the stated requirement
  • Clean separation of concerns between authentication and authorization

Minor Notes:

  • Some unwrap() calls in non-security paths (cluster.rs:155, web.rs:102) could be improved with better error handling, but pose no security risk
  • The new Path implementation with lifetime handling is well-implemented despite the author's concerns about lifetimes

Overall Assessment: This is a solid security-focused refactor that improves JWT compliance while adding multi-path authorization capabilities. No security issues found.


@kixelated kixelated merged commit bee49c0 into main Aug 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@kixelated kixelated deleted the multi-auth branch August 12, 2025 23:39
@moq-bot moq-bot bot mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants