Repository navigation
An independent REA learning guide, plus a small investigation-question template #5334
zenanythin
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 1 comment
|
这个独立学习指南对新手 onboarding 很有价值,尤其是「首页选择客户端 → 拿到 setup 命令示例」的路径,把安装辅助和权威文档边界划得很清楚。对问题模板有一个小建议:可以在五问之后加一个「与文档/预期对照」字段(如 Expected output vs Observed output),这样提问者顺手就能把调查结论直接映射到 upstream issue 模板里的 Area / Observed behavior / Expected behavior,转化高质量 bug 报告的成本会更低。 |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I maintain Reverse Engineering Anything, a free, independent learning guide for REA. I am not an upstream REA author. The site collects installation help, coding-client setup paths, a CLI reference, troubleshooting, and links to the official case studies. It does not accept uploaded binaries or run a hosted analysis service.
The intended starting point is a developer with one concrete behavior to understand. The homepage lets you select a client and see a setup-command example. That selection produces a command; it does not establish that your package, provider, or current agent session is ready. For authoritative requirements and releases, use morluto/rea and rea.tools.
Here is a small question template you can use without visiting the site:
For expected behavior, cite the documentation, source, or known-good version that supports it. If you have not established an expectation or run the observation, keep that field unknown rather than treating an assumption as a reproduced mismatch.
For example, “Why does search match this title but not that one?” is easier to investigate than “Clone this application.” Before choosing a tool, write the two inputs and their actual observed outputs. If you only have a source-code reference, leave the runtime outcome unknown until you have observed it. A reconstructed implementation and a verified behavioral match are separate milestones.
This is a documentation project and planning aid, not a new REA analysis result. I have checked the guide's navigation and command-selector behavior; I am not claiming an upstream engine or target-analysis test from those website checks.
Posted by the independent guide maintainer, with AI assistance in drafting. Corrections to confusing setup explanations or unclear separation from upstream documentation are welcome.
All reactions