Skip to content

[DSD-10018]Clarify instructions for testing plugin fixes#200

Merged
Prafulrakhade merged 1 commit intomosip:release-1.4.xfrom
Mahesh-Binayak:patch-3
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

[DSD-10018]Clarify instructions for testing plugin fixes#200
Prafulrakhade merged 1 commit intomosip:release-1.4.xfrom
Mahesh-Binayak:patch-3

Conversation

@Mahesh-Binayak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Mahesh-Binayak Mahesh-Binayak commented Mar 30, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Refined wording in the plugin usage documentation for improved clarity.

Signed-off-by: Mahesh-Binayak <76687012+Mahesh-Binayak@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2026

Walkthrough

A minor text adjustment was made to the README.md file in the "How to use the plugin with fixes where the eSignet is not yet released?" section, changing "There are two ways to do that:" to "There are two ways :" for brevity.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Simplified wording in section header by removing "to do that" phrase, reducing text length while maintaining meaning.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A curious edit, swift and light,
Just words trimmed short—they shine more bright! ✨
From "to do that" to cleaner prose,
This rabbit's wisdom gently flows.
~CodeRabbit

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title refers to clarifying instructions, but the actual change is only a minor wording adjustment from 'There are two ways to do that:' to 'There are two ways :' in the README, which is a trivial edit rather than clarification of instructions. Consider if this minor punctuation/wording change warrants a pull request, or revise the title to accurately reflect that this is a trivial README wording adjustment rather than instruction clarification.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 16: Update the awkward instruction sentence "There are two ways :" by
removing the extra space before the colon and clarifying the phrasing—replace it
with either "There are two ways to do this:" or "There are two ways:" so the
sentence reads cleanly and grammatically; locate the line containing the exact
phrase "There are two ways :" in the README and replace it accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9c528834-bdae-43ba-b71d-68ff19ab2747

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 399bc4c and ecc1ca2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Comment thread README.md
@Prafulrakhade Prafulrakhade merged commit 91c4de4 into mosip:release-1.4.x Mar 30, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants