Skip to content

Comments

Fix: 쿠키 도메인 설정 주석 처리#189

Merged
toothlessdev merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
fix#187
Aug 2, 2025
Merged

Fix: 쿠키 도메인 설정 주석 처리#189
toothlessdev merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
fix#187

Conversation

@toothlessdev
Copy link
Member

@toothlessdev toothlessdev commented Aug 2, 2025

✨ 구현한 기능

  • 쿠키 도메인 설정 주석 처리하여 로컬 개발환경 테스트

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated cookie handling to no longer set a specific domain for cookies during logout and in development/production environments. This change does not affect other cookie attributes or overall functionality.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @toothlessdev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a common challenge in web development by adjusting how cookies are configured. By commenting out specific domain settings, it aims to streamline the local development and testing workflow, ensuring that cookie-dependent features function correctly in non-production environments.

Highlights

  • Cookie Domain Configuration: I've commented out the explicit cookie domain settings (e.g., .mosuedu.com, api.mosuedu.com) in several cookie creation and logout methods. This change is specifically aimed at resolving issues with cookie handling in local development environments, allowing for smoother testing without domain-related restrictions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This change comments out all explicit settings of the cookie domain attribute (".mosuedu.com") in both logout handling and cookie creation utilities. The domain is no longer set for cookies in development and production environments, but all other cookie attributes and logic remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Logout Handler Cookie Domain Removal
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/handler/AuthLogoutHandler.java
Commented out the line that sets the cookie domain during logout, so the domain is no longer explicitly set.
Cookie Utility Domain Setting Disabled
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/util/CookieBuilderUtil.java
Commented out all lines that set the cookie domain for development and production environment cookie creation methods. Local environment logic is unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Server
    participant CookieUtil

    Client->>Server: Initiates logout or receives cookie
    Server->>CookieUtil: Requests cookie creation/clearing
    CookieUtil-->>Server: Returns cookie (without explicit domain)
    Server-->>Client: Sends response with cookie (no domain set)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A cookie once wore a domain so proud,
".mosuedu.com" was its shroud.
But now, domain lines are left unsaid,
As cookies roam free instead.
Logout and creation, both now the same—
Simpler cookies, no domain to name!
🥕🍪

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e3c3a4 and ab2cbc5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/handler/AuthLogoutHandler.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/util/CookieBuilderUtil.java (4 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix#187

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request comments out cookie domain settings to facilitate local development. While this achieves the immediate goal, it introduces a significant risk of deploying broken authentication to production environments. My review focuses on this maintainability and correctness issue, recommending a move towards externalized configuration using Spring profiles and properties. This will create a more robust and reliable system for managing environment-specific settings.

.forEach(cookie -> {
// cookie.setSecure(true);
cookie.setDomain(".mosuedu.com");
// cookie.setDomain(".mosuedu.com");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Commenting out the domain for cookie clearing is risky. To correctly clear a cookie, its domain and path must match the ones it was set with. This value should be managed via external configuration (e.g., Spring properties) to ensure consistency with how cookies are created across different environments. This prevents scenarios where logout fails because the cookie attributes don't match.

return createBaseResponseCookieBuilder(name, value, maxAge)
// .secure(true)
.domain(".mosuedu.com")
// .domain(".mosuedu.com")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Commenting out the cookie domain for local testing is a fragile practice that introduces a high risk of breaking authentication if accidentally deployed to production. All similar changes in this file share the same risk.

A more robust solution involves two parts:

  1. Externalize Configuration: Manage the cookie domain via Spring Profiles and configuration files (application.yml or .properties). This allows you to set the domain per environment without modifying the code.

  2. Fix Environment-Specific Logic: This utility has methods for local, develop, and production. The fact that develop and production methods are being modified for local testing suggests the application isn't correctly selecting the createLocal... methods when running locally. This underlying issue should be addressed.

By fixing the environment detection and using external configuration, you'll create a much safer and more maintainable system. I've marked this as high severity due to the potential for a critical failure in production.

Cookie cookie = createBaseServletCookie(name, value, maxAge);
// cookie.setSecure(true);
cookie.setDomain(".mosuedu.com");
// cookie.setDomain(".mosuedu.com");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Commenting out the cookie domain for local testing is a fragile practice that introduces a high risk of breaking authentication if accidentally deployed to production. All similar changes in this file share the same risk.

A more robust solution involves two parts:

  1. Externalize Configuration: Manage the cookie domain via Spring Profiles and configuration files (application.yml or .properties). This allows you to set the domain per environment without modifying the code.

  2. Fix Environment-Specific Logic: This utility has methods for local, develop, and production. This suggests the application isn't correctly selecting the createLocal... methods when running locally. This underlying issue should be addressed.

By fixing the environment detection and using external configuration, you'll create a much safer and more maintainable system. I've marked this as high severity due to the potential for a critical failure in production.

return createBaseResponseCookieBuilder(name, value, maxAge)
// .secure(true)
.domain(".mosuedu.com") // TODO: 운영 도메인으로 변경
// .domain(".mosuedu.com") // TODO: 운영 도메인으로 변경

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Commenting out the cookie domain for local testing is a fragile practice that introduces a high risk of breaking authentication if accidentally deployed to production. All similar changes in this file share the same risk.

A more robust solution involves two parts:

  1. Externalize Configuration: Manage the cookie domain via Spring Profiles and configuration files (application.yml or .properties). This allows you to set the domain per environment without modifying the code.

  2. Fix Environment-Specific Logic: This utility has methods for local, develop, and production. This suggests the application isn't correctly selecting the createLocal... methods when running locally. This underlying issue should be addressed.

By fixing the environment detection and using external configuration, you'll create a much safer and more maintainable system. I've marked this as high severity due to the potential for a critical failure in production.

Cookie cookie = createBaseServletCookie(name, value, maxAge);
// cookie.setSecure(true);
cookie.setDomain("api.mosuedu.com"); // TODO: 운영 도메인으로 변경
// cookie.setDomain("api.mosuedu.com"); // TODO: 운영 도메인으로 변경

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Commenting out the cookie domain for local testing is a fragile practice that introduces a high risk of breaking authentication if accidentally deployed to production. All similar changes in this file share the same risk.

A more robust solution involves two parts:

  1. Externalize Configuration: Manage the cookie domain via Spring Profiles and configuration files (application.yml or .properties). This allows you to set the domain per environment without modifying the code.

  2. Fix Environment-Specific Logic: This utility has methods for local, develop, and production. This suggests the application isn't correctly selecting the createLocal... methods when running locally. This underlying issue should be addressed.

By fixing the environment detection and using external configuration, you'll create a much safer and more maintainable system. I've marked this as high severity due to the potential for a critical failure in production.

@toothlessdev toothlessdev merged commit d02c7b7 into develop Aug 2, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant