Skip to content

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

eslint just published its new version 3.1.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency eslint
New version 3.1.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 8 commits .

  • ec58bc7 3.1.1
  • 73f4cda Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.1.1
  • 565e584 Fix: eslint:all causes regression in 3.1.0 (fixes #6687) (#6696)
  • cb90359 Fix: Allow named recursive functions (fixes #6616) (#6667)
  • 3f206dd Fix: balanced false positive in spaced-comment (fixes #6689) (#6692)
  • 57f1676 Docs: Add missing brackets from code examples (#6700)
  • 124f066 Chore: Remove fixable key from multiline-ternary metadata (fixes #6683) (#6688)
  • 9f96086 Fix: Escape control characters in XML. (fixes #6673) (#6672)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@muffinresearch muffinresearch merged commit ca80f31 into master Jul 20, 2016
@addons-robot addons-robot deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-3.1.1 branch July 20, 2016 09:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants