Update android dependencies [ci full] by rfk · Pull Request #4345 · mozilla/application-services

rfk · 2021-07-20T05:32:40Z

This uses the new, cleaner factoring of our Android config from #4194
as an excuse to update some of our Android dependencies to bring them
inline with what's used in current android-components. It was much
easier than it has been in the past!

I'm getting some weird test failures locally that look transient, let's
see what CI has to say about them...

codecov-commenter · 2021-07-20T05:38:03Z

Codecov Report

Merging #4345 (36693c6) into main (cf35f6c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4345   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.67%   75.67%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        4140     4140           
=======================================
  Hits         3133     3133           
  Misses       1007     1007

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf35f6c...36693c6. Read the comment docs.

rfk · 2021-07-20T05:37:02Z


    dependencies {
        classpath "com.android.tools.build:gradle:$android_gradle_plugin_version"
+        classpath "org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-gradle-plugin:$kotlin_version"


TBH I'm not sure why things were working without this on our classpath, maybe we were just always using the "system" version of kotlin?

rfk · 2021-07-20T05:40:10Z

        src {
            switch (DefaultPlatform.RESOURCE_PREFIX) {
                case 'darwin':
+                case 'darwin-x86-64':


The name of the platform has changed in the latest release of JNA, for reasons to do with the M1 arm64 silicon stuff.

rfk · 2021-07-20T05:40:37Z

 apply plugin: 'com.android.library'
 apply plugin: 'org.mozilla.rust-android-gradle.rust-android'
 apply plugin: 'kotlin-android'
-apply plugin: 'kotlin-android-extensions'


This plugin reports being deprecated, and removing it didn't seem to break anything, so...

rfk · 2021-07-20T05:50:54Z

I'm getting some weird test failures locally that look transient, let's see what CI has to say about them...

Well, at least I got a different set of errors in TaskCluster...


[task 2021-07-20T05:39:57.106Z] Could not determine the dependencies of task ':full-megazord:publishAarPublicationToProjectBuildDirRepository'.
[task 2021-07-20T05:39:57.106Z] > java.lang.NullPointerException (no error message)

rfk · 2021-07-20T07:04:37Z

This is now failing on some Nimbus error from the updated Kotlin version:

[task 2021-07-20T06:55:10.626Z] > Task :nimbus:compileReleaseKotlin FAILED
[task 2021-07-20T06:55:10.626Z] e: /builds/worker/checkouts/src/components/nimbus/android/src/main/java/org/mozilla/experiments/nimbus/FeatureVariables.kt: (129, 34): Type checking has run into a recursive problem. Easiest workaround: specify types of your declarations explicitly

The line in question is:

    override fun getText(key: String) = getString(key)?.let(this::asText)

Which I don't understand enough to know how to add type declarations to it. @jhugman any chance you can help with that one?

rfk · 2021-07-20T07:37:47Z

-        android_components_version = '75.0.0'
+        kotlin_version = '1.5.20'
+        kotlin_coroutines_version = '1.5.0'
+        jna_version = '5.8.0'


By the way, this version of JNA seems to fix the struct-padding bug from mozilla/uniffi-rs#334 \o/

rfk · 2021-07-22T02:32:56Z

Which I don't understand enough to know how to add type declarations to it. @jhugman any chance you can help with that one?

I figured it out, and also made some adjustments for deprecated Glean APIs.

rfk · 2021-07-22T02:33:35Z

+  RethrowCaughtException:
+    active: false
+  SwallowedException:
+    active: false


These were newly triggering some detekt failures. I've disabled the ones that are disabled in a-c, and fixed the others.

rfk · 2021-07-22T02:34:43Z

-                        NimbusEvents.enrollmentKeys.experiment to event.experimentSlug,
-                        NimbusEvents.enrollmentKeys.branch to event.branchSlug,
-                        NimbusEvents.enrollmentKeys.enrollmentId to event.enrollmentId
+                    NimbusEvents.enrollment.record(NimbusEvents.EnrollmentExtra(


The previous Glean recording API is deprecated, and there's a new more strongly-typed one documented here.

rfk · 2021-07-22T04:27:09Z

OK, fingers crossed for CI, but I think this is ready to go! I've tested out the local development flow and confirmed that a Fenix build using these updates still builds and runs and syncs stuff successfully.

@travis79, could you please r? this for the Nimbus/Glean deprecation changes?

rfk · 2021-07-22T04:28:05Z

    fun asText(res: Int) = context.getString(res)
    fun asDrawable(res: Int) = context.getDrawable(res)
-    fun asText(string: String) = asStringResource(string)?.let(this::asText) ?: string
+    fun asText(string: String): String? = asStringResource(string)?.let(this::asText) ?: string


This was the magic sauce necessary to avoid a recursion error in Kotlin's type resolution.

travis79

This is great! Hopefully migrating to the new Glean event API wasn't too bad.

This uses the new, cleaner factoring of our Android config from #4194 as an excuse to update some of our Android dependencies to bring them inline with what's used in current android-components. It was much easier than it has been in the past!

rfk · 2021-07-26T00:54:39Z

I'm going to go ahead and merge this once CI goes green, since I want to Glean updates for completeness over in #4356

This uses the new, cleaner factoring of our Android config from #4194 as an excuse to update some of our Android dependencies to bring them inline with what's used in current android-components. It was much easier than it has been in the past!

rfk commented Jul 20, 2021

View reviewed changes

rfk force-pushed the update-android-deps-20210720 branch 2 times, most recently from da37f43 to 6fbd35c Compare July 20, 2021 07:03

rfk commented Jul 20, 2021

View reviewed changes

rfk force-pushed the update-android-deps-20210720 branch 3 times, most recently from 71b334d to 2716f2b Compare July 22, 2021 02:32

rfk commented Jul 22, 2021

View reviewed changes

rfk force-pushed the update-android-deps-20210720 branch from 2716f2b to 8e92c6c Compare July 22, 2021 04:22

rfk marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2021 04:27

rfk requested review from a team and travis79 July 22, 2021 04:27

rfk commented Jul 22, 2021

View reviewed changes

rfk force-pushed the update-android-deps-20210720 branch from 8e92c6c to a4bd5bf Compare July 22, 2021 04:30

travis79 approved these changes Jul 22, 2021

View reviewed changes

Update android dependencies [ci full]

36693c6

This uses the new, cleaner factoring of our Android config from #4194 as an excuse to update some of our Android dependencies to bring them inline with what's used in current android-components. It was much easier than it has been in the past!

rfk force-pushed the update-android-deps-20210720 branch from a4bd5bf to 36693c6 Compare July 26, 2021 00:47

rfk merged commit c40fd3a into main Jul 26, 2021

rfk deleted the update-android-deps-20210720 branch July 26, 2021 01:09

Conversation

rfk commented Jul 20, 2021

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Jul 20, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 20, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 20, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 20, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk commented Jul 20, 2021

Uh oh!

rfk commented Jul 20, 2021

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 20, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk commented Jul 22, 2021

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 22, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 22, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk commented Jul 22, 2021

Uh oh!

rfk Jul 22, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

travis79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfk commented Jul 26, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

codecov-commenter commented Jul 20, 2021 •

edited

Loading