Skip to content

Fix the issue in the ref test tracemonkey-extract_0_2_12#20884

Merged
timvandermeij merged 1 commit intomozilla:masterfrom
calixteman:fix_extract_text
Mar 15, 2026
Merged

Fix the issue in the ref test tracemonkey-extract_0_2_12#20884
timvandermeij merged 1 commit intomozilla:masterfrom
calixteman:fix_extract_text

Conversation

@calixteman
Copy link
Contributor

@calixteman calixteman commented Mar 15, 2026

When getting the extracted document, the url for the wasms wasn't passed and consequently the icc-based color wasn't rendered as expected because of the wasm for qcms.

When getting the extracted document, the url for the wasms wasn't passed
and consequently the icc-based color wasn't rendered as expected because of the wasm for qcms.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.52%. Comparing base (3127492) to head (dde0bea).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #20884   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.51%   62.52%           
=======================================
  Files         173      173           
  Lines      121246   121246           
=======================================
+ Hits        75796    75803    +7     
+ Misses      45450    45443    -7     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittestcli 62.52% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@timvandermeij timvandermeij left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me, with passing tests. Really nice find!

@timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor

/botio test

@timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor

/botio-linux test

@moz-tools-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

From: Bot.io (Linux m4)


Received

Command cmd_test from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0

Live output at: http://54.241.84.105:8877/40c5dd49da64fa7/output.txt

@mozilla mozilla deleted a comment from moz-tools-bot Mar 15, 2026
@mozilla mozilla deleted a comment from moz-tools-bot Mar 15, 2026
@mozilla mozilla deleted a comment from moz-tools-bot Mar 15, 2026
@mozilla mozilla deleted a comment from moz-tools-bot Mar 15, 2026
@timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor

/botio-windows browsertest

@moz-tools-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

From: Bot.io (Windows)


Received

Command cmd_browsertest from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0

Live output at: http://54.193.163.58:8877/cc152fc0cd0ce0b/output.txt

@moz-tools-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

From: Bot.io (Windows)


Success

Full output at http://54.193.163.58:8877/cc152fc0cd0ce0b/output.txt

Total script time: 25.08 mins

  • Regression tests: Passed

@moz-tools-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

From: Bot.io (Linux m4)


Failed

Full output at http://54.241.84.105:8877/40c5dd49da64fa7/output.txt

Total script time: 44.60 mins

  • Unit tests: Passed
  • Integration Tests: FAILED
  • Regression tests: Passed

@timvandermeij timvandermeij merged commit 1192e5e into mozilla:master Mar 15, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants