Fixed wrong MRuby::Build.current at the top level of mrbgem.rake#6624
Fixed wrong MRuby::Build.current at the top level of mrbgem.rake#6624matz merged 1 commit intomruby:masterfrom
MRuby::Build.current at the top level of mrbgem.rake#6624Conversation
Until now, GEMS added via `gem.add_dependency` retained the last `MRuby::Build.current` from the build configuration file, which was accessible from the top level of `mrbgem.rake`.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @dearblue, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request resolves an issue where the global MRuby::Build.current context could become incorrect when loading mrbgem.rake files, particularly for gems added as dependencies. The changes implement a mechanism to temporarily switch to the correct build context before loading an mrbgem.rake file and then reliably restore the previous context, ensuring that gem configurations are processed with the intended build settings.
Highlights
- Correct
MRuby::Build.currentContext: Ensures that theMRuby::Build.currentvariable is correctly set to the specific build configuration when anmrbgem.rakefile is loaded, preventing it from retaining an incorrect context from previous build configurations. - Robust Context Restoration: Introduces a
begin...ensureblock around theload gemrakecall, guaranteeing that the originalMRuby::Build.currentcontext is always restored after themrbgem.rakefile has been processed, even if an error occurs during its loading.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a bug where MRuby::Build.current was not restored after loading a gem's mrbgem.rake file, which could cause issues with subsequent gem loading. The use of a begin..ensure block to manage this global state is a robust solution. The code is well-structured, and I have one suggestion to further improve its clarity by removing a redundant check.
| fail "Can't find #{gemrake}" unless File.exist?(gemrake) | ||
|
|
||
| current_build = MRuby::Build.current | ||
| build = self.is_a?(MRuby::Build) ? self : MRuby::Build.current |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Until now, GEMS added via
gem.add_dependencyretained the lastMRuby::Build.currentfrom the build configuration file, which was accessible from the top level ofmrbgem.rake.