Skip to content

Fixed wrong MRuby::Build.current at the top level of mrbgem.rake#6624

Merged
matz merged 1 commit intomruby:masterfrom
dearblue:build.current
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

Fixed wrong MRuby::Build.current at the top level of mrbgem.rake#6624
matz merged 1 commit intomruby:masterfrom
dearblue:build.current

Conversation

@dearblue
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Until now, GEMS added via gem.add_dependency retained the last MRuby::Build.current from the build configuration file, which was accessible from the top level of mrbgem.rake.

Until now, GEMS added via `gem.add_dependency` retained the last `MRuby::Build.current` from the build configuration file, which was accessible from the top level of `mrbgem.rake`.
@dearblue dearblue requested a review from matz as a code owner September 17, 2025 13:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added the build label Sep 17, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @dearblue, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where the global MRuby::Build.current context could become incorrect when loading mrbgem.rake files, particularly for gems added as dependencies. The changes implement a mechanism to temporarily switch to the correct build context before loading an mrbgem.rake file and then reliably restore the previous context, ensuring that gem configurations are processed with the intended build settings.

Highlights

  • Correct MRuby::Build.current Context: Ensures that the MRuby::Build.current variable is correctly set to the specific build configuration when an mrbgem.rake file is loaded, preventing it from retaining an incorrect context from previous build configurations.
  • Robust Context Restoration: Introduces a begin...ensure block around the load gemrake call, guaranteeing that the original MRuby::Build.current context is always restored after the mrbgem.rake file has been processed, even if an error occurs during its loading.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug where MRuby::Build.current was not restored after loading a gem's mrbgem.rake file, which could cause issues with subsequent gem loading. The use of a begin..ensure block to manage this global state is a robust solution. The code is well-structured, and I have one suggestion to further improve its clarity by removing a redundant check.

fail "Can't find #{gemrake}" unless File.exist?(gemrake)

current_build = MRuby::Build.current
build = self.is_a?(MRuby::Build) ? self : MRuby::Build.current
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The check self.is_a?(MRuby::Build) appears to be redundant. The gem method is part of the MRuby::LoadGems module, which is included in MRuby::Build. All call sites seem to confirm that self is always an instance of MRuby::Build. You can simplify this line for better readability.

      build = self

@matz matz merged commit d074aaa into mruby:master Sep 17, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants