Replies: 1 comment
|
Update: this question aged well. AI trading agents just lost $45M because no one tested what happens when an agent can approve its own payments. Step Finance's treasury was drained of 261,854 SOL — not through a smart contract exploit, but because the agents had the same wallet permissions as the compromised executives. No spending ceiling, no multi-sig gate, no rate limit on autonomous payment decisions. Our x402/L402 harness (X4-055, X4-038, X4-014) tests for cascading payment chains, double-spend, and fake facilitator injection. Full writeup with code snippets and gap analysis here: #177 Still haven't found another x402/L402 security test suite. The offer stands. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
x402 is processing 1B+ HTTP 402 responses/day through Cloudflare. L402 is growing on Lightning. Agent-to-agent payments are becoming real.
But who's actually testing the security of these flows?
We built 39 dedicated tests for agent payment protocols — unauthorized execution, budget overflow, replay attacks, facilitator trust, cross-chain confusion, autonomy risk scoring. As far as we can tell, no other tool covers this.
Questions for the community:
We're especially interested in hearing from teams at fintechs, neobanks, or payment platforms building on these rails.
Context:
All reactions