-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Fix bot workflow upgrading lock file and remove docdict and stubs #108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mscheltienne has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (23)
WalkthroughThe GitHub Actions workflow configuration was updated to rename the workflow, expand trigger events, adjust permissions, and refine job steps for Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/bot.yaml (1)
39-39: Consider parameterizing repository check
Hard-codinggithub.repository == 'mscheltienne/template-python'may limit reusability in forks or new repos—consider making it configurable or removing it.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
uv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/bot.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/bot.yaml (6)
1-1: Workflow renamed toautofix.ci
The new name accurately reflects its purpose and aligns with other CI workflows.
6-9: Expanded trigger events look good
Includingscheduleandworkflow_dispatchalongsidepull_requestincreases automation flexibility.
13-14: Scopedcontents: writepermission to uv-lock job
Moving permissions to the job level adheres to the principle of least privilege.
20-21: Pinautofix-ci/action@v1.3.2for PR runs
Locking to a specific action version and restricting it to pull requests ensures stability and security.
25-31: Push step for scheduled/manual runs is correct
The conditional commit & push only when changes exist avoids no-op commits and keeps the history clean.
35-37: Scoped permissions for auto-merge job
Granting onlycontents: writeandpull-requests: writeto this job follows best practices.
Summary by CodeRabbit