Skip to content

JSONPrettyStorage for pretty printed storage.#60

Closed
rainwoodman wants to merge 1 commit intomsiemens:masterfrom
rainwoodman:master
Closed

JSONPrettyStorage for pretty printed storage.#60
rainwoodman wants to merge 1 commit intomsiemens:masterfrom
rainwoodman:master

Conversation

@rainwoodman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not pretty. I wrapped JSONStorage class in a factory function for this.
Similar pattern is for the CachingStorageMiddleware The number of cached operations can't be provided as a parameter and may need to be modified as well.

I am happy to see a more elegant alternative!

@msiemens
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

msiemens commented Jun 3, 2015

Thanks for the pull request! While the JSON storage could use more flexibility, I think the implementation can be simpler. I've implemented an alternative in #61. Could you have a look at it?

@rainwoodman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closed as dup of #61

@rainwoodman rainwoodman closed this Jun 5, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants