712 leetcode solved#1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughIntroduces a new LeetCode 712 solution that uses dynamic programming to compute the minimum ASCII deletion sum from two strings. The implementation validates inputs, builds a DP table with base cases, and fills it using character-match or deletion-cost minimization. Two JUnit tests validate the algorithm against known outputs. ChangesMinimum ASCII Delete Sum Solution
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/test/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStringsTest.java (1)
11-19: ⚡ Quick winAdd boundary tests for empty/equal inputs.
Current tests cover canonical examples, but not base-path behavior (empty strings and already-equal strings), which are important for the DP border conditions.
Suggested additional tests
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals; import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; @@ `@Test` void case2() { assertEquals(403, minimumDeleteSum("delete", "leet")); } + + `@Test` + void emptyStrings() { + assertEquals(0, minimumDeleteSum("", "")); + assertEquals((int) 'a', minimumDeleteSum("a", "")); + assertEquals((int) 'a', minimumDeleteSum("", "a")); + } + + `@Test` + void alreadyEqualStrings() { + assertEquals(0, minimumDeleteSum("abc", "abc")); + } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/test/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStringsTest.java` around lines 11 - 19, Add boundary tests to MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStringsTest to cover empty and already-equal inputs: add test methods that assert minimumDeleteSum("", "") == 0, minimumDeleteSum("abc", "") == sum of ascii of "abc" and minimumDeleteSum("", "abc") == same sum, and minimumDeleteSum("same","same") == 0 so DP border conditions are validated; locate tests in the class alongside existing case1/case2 and use the same assertEquals style with the minimumDeleteSum function name.src/main/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings.java (1)
13-15: ⚡ Quick winFix the DP approach/space complexity wording in Javadoc.
Line 13 describes the method as top-down, but the implementation is bottom-up tabulation (Lines 27–50).
Line 14 also impliesO(min(N, K))space, while current code allocatesrows * cols.Suggested doc-only patch
- /** - * Solved using top-down dynamic programming approach. - * time: O(N*K), space: O(N*K) ~ O(min(N, K)) + /** + * Solved using bottom-up dynamic programming (tabulation). + * time: O(N*K), space: O(N*K) + * (Space can be optimized to O(min(N, K)) with a rolling 1D DP array.)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/main/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings.java` around lines 13 - 15, The Javadoc is incorrect: the implementation in MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings uses a bottom-up tabulation (not top-down) as implemented in the DP loop around lines 27–50, and the space complexity is not O(min(N,K)) because the code allocates a full rows x cols table. Update the Javadoc to say "bottom-up tabulation" (or "iterative DP/tabulation") and set time complexity to O(N*K) and space complexity to O(N*K) (or mention O(min(N,K)) only if you also change the implementation to use a rolling 1D array optimization); keep the method/class name MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings as the reference when updating the comment.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In
`@src/main/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings.java`:
- Around line 13-15: The Javadoc is incorrect: the implementation in
MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings uses a bottom-up tabulation (not top-down) as
implemented in the DP loop around lines 27–50, and the space complexity is not
O(min(N,K)) because the code allocates a full rows x cols table. Update the
Javadoc to say "bottom-up tabulation" (or "iterative DP/tabulation") and set
time complexity to O(N*K) and space complexity to O(N*K) (or mention O(min(N,K))
only if you also change the implementation to use a rolling 1D array
optimization); keep the method/class name MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings as
the reference when updating the comment.
In
`@src/test/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStringsTest.java`:
- Around line 11-19: Add boundary tests to
MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStringsTest to cover empty and already-equal inputs:
add test methods that assert minimumDeleteSum("", "") == 0,
minimumDeleteSum("abc", "") == sum of ascii of "abc" and minimumDeleteSum("",
"abc") == same sum, and minimumDeleteSum("same","same") == 0 so DP border
conditions are validated; locate tests in the class alongside existing
case1/case2 and use the same assertEquals style with the minimumDeleteSum
function name.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 7dfdabc5-b438-480e-91fa-ea6c6d42d9ac
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStrings.javasrc/test/java/com/github/mstepan/leetcode/medium/MinimumAsciiDeleteSumForTwoStringsTest.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
712 leetcode solved
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests