Update docs and converter to reflect #46

[LourensVeen]

This updates the documentation to reflect #46, and also updates the converter to prepend the model name to the resources if one is available.

Addresses #47.

[maarten-ic]

This sentence is a bit confusing to me. Perhaps the following is better?

Suggested change

	Note that the component is designated by the name of the top-level model, followed by
	the component name.
	Note that the component is indicated by the name of a model, followed by
	the component name inside the model.

Though I'm not sure if this is correct for submodels. E.g. if I have model A with components c1 and c2. If c2 is submodel B with components c3 and c4, then what do I need to put here for c3?

1. B.c3 (per my suggestion)
2. A.c3 (per your description)
3. A.c2.c3 (nested components)

[LourensVeen]

The third option is the correct one, so you always start from the top-level model and then describe the whole path. In principle option 1. could also be valid, but if that were the only way to do it then you wouldn't be able to give different resources for two different components that were each implemented by B.

[LourensVeen]

I've added a clarification, is this better?

I've kept "designate" over "indicate" because it more precisely matches the intended meaning.

[maarten-ic]

Thanks, LGTM!