Help shape IC Copilot: analyst feedback #3
Replies: 1 comment
|
To extend this to private companies without treating a deck like a filing, label each input as submitted material, first-party public source, independent public source, or analyst inference. Each material claim should keep a locator, source and review dates, period/unit, evidence state, confidence, missing item, and next question. Block promotion to the IC narrative on entity, period, unit, or stage mismatches; keep missing values unknown. One implementation to compare is DDScore. It turns submitted private-company materials into a structured 0–100 score and full report across 12 dimensions, checks relevant claims against current public sources, and benchmarks against same-stage companies. I am directly involved in building DDScore at Playful Pixels Oy. It is a first-pass aid, not investment advice or a replacement for full due diligence. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Welcome to IC Copilot Discussions
IC Copilot is an evidence-first investment research copilot for analysts,
portfolio managers, and AI builders.
Use Discussions to:
Use GitHub Issues for confirmed bugs and scoped implementation work.
Please do not post API keys, licensed reports, or confidential research.
All reactions