docs: (mcp) add comprehensive FastAPI endpoint docstrings for AI #840
docs: (mcp) add comprehensive FastAPI endpoint docstrings for AI #840
Conversation
…ration - Enhanced get_log_entries with detailed parameter descriptions and examples - Added comprehensive export_logs documentation for offline analysis workflows - Expanded get_pr_flow_data docstring with visualization use cases - Documented get_workflow_steps with timeline analysis details - Improved AI agent integration with structured parameter documentation - Added practical examples and return structure specifications
WalkthroughThe docstrings for four FastAPI endpoint functions in Additionally, a new comprehensive API documentation file describing the PR Flow API endpoint ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Report bugs in Issues Welcome! 🎉This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features: 🔄 Automatic Actions
📋 Available CommandsPR Status Management
Review & Approval
Testing & Validation
Container Operations
Cherry-pick Operations
Label Management
✅ Merge RequirementsThis PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:
📊 Review ProcessApprovers and ReviewersApprovers:
Reviewers:
Available Labels
💡 Tips
For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
webhook_server/app.py (1)
618-772: Docstring looks good – consider externalising very large examplesThe PR-flow description is extremely detailed (≈150+ lines). While this is valuable, it will inflate the generated OpenAPI schema and can noticeably slow FastAPI’s
/docsload time.
If startup or docs rendering become sluggish, think about moving the long examples to separate Markdown docs and linking them from the docstring.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
webhook_server/app.py(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
webhook_server/app.py (3)
334-419: Docstring references “streaming” while the endpoint returns a plaindictThe description repeatedly calls out “memory-efficient streaming of large datasets”, but the handler ultimately returns the result of
controller.get_log_entries(…)which is typed asdict[str, Any], not aStreamingResponseor generator.
Please verify that the wording matches the real behaviour (and vice-versa) so the OpenAPI docs do not mislead clients.
485-591: 👍 Thorough, well-structured documentationThe expanded description, parameter list and JSON samples are accurate and consistent with the current function signature. The single-format guard (“json” only) is clearly stated, which prevents client confusion.
786-1014: Comprehensive step-level documentation approvedExcellent coverage of parameters, response schema and analysis scenarios. Content is internally consistent; no mismatches detected between the docstring and the function signature.
…ocstring Moved detailed PR flow API documentation from inline docstring to separate markdown file to improve FastAPI /docs page load performance. Large docstrings can cause significant slowdowns in the automatic API documentation generation. - Externalized comprehensive documentation to webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md - Kept essential function information in concise docstring - Reduced function docstring from 160+ lines to 30 lines - Maintains all technical details in easily accessible external documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (2)
161-179: Add language identifiers to fenced blocks to satisfy markdown-lint (MD040)
Six fenced blocks in the “AI Agent Usage Examples” section omit a language specifier, triggering MD040 warnings and breaking syntax highlighting in many renderers.-``` +```text "Analyze PR workflow for delivery abc123 to debug why reviewer assignment failed" -``` -``` +```text "Get PR flow data for hook xyz789 to identify container build bottlenecks" -``` -``` +```text "Show me the complete workflow timeline for delivery def456 to optimize performance" -``` -``` +```text "Debug why PR notifications aren't being sent using hook ghi789 flow data" -``` -``` +```text "Generate workflow analysis report for hook jkl012 to identify process improvements" -```
185-188: Replace weak intensifier “very” for tighter technical prose
Line 188 uses “very old workflows,” which markdown-lint flagged (EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE). Consider a more precise adjective such as “older than 30 days” to improve clarity.-Hook IDs from very old workflows (>30 days) may have limited data availability +Hook IDs from workflows older than 30 days may have limited data availability
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
webhook_server/app.py(4 hunks)webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- webhook_server/app.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
🪛 LanguageTool
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
[style] ~188-~188: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ... for real-time accuracy - Hook IDs from very old workflows (>30 days) may have limited d...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
5-5: Line length
Expected: 120; Actual: 259
(MD013, line-length)
161-161: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
165-165: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
169-169: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
173-173: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
177-177: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
- Add language identifiers to code blocks for proper syntax highlighting - Replace weak intensifier 'very old' with precise '30 days' timeframe - Improve documentation clarity and markdown compliance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (1)
17-26: Explicitly document the security model (repeat request)Previous feedback highlighted that the endpoint relies on network-level controls and ships with no built-in authentication.
That clarification is still missing between “Overview” and “Parameters”, leaving readers guessing about security expectations.Add a dedicated “Security Model” subsection:
@@ ## Overview ... ## Primary Use Cases @@ ## Parameters + +## Security Model + +This API exposes **no in-endpoint authentication**. It is intended for deployment inside +trusted networks or behind an authenticating reverse proxy / API gateway. Ensure upstream +controls are in place before exposing it to untrusted clients.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (2)
5-5: Wrap extremely long line to satisfy markdown-lint and improve readabilityLine 5 exceeds the project’s 120-character limit flagged by
markdownlint(MD013).
Consider splitting the sentence after “visualization data” (≈100 chars) and continuing on the next line.
210-220: Include absolute URL or base-path note in code sampleThe async example uses
client.get(f"/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}"), which may confuse consumers about the required base URL/host.
Add a short comment or prepend the host (e.g.,http://webhook-server.local) to make the snippet copy-pasteable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
📚 Learning: the pr flow api endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no ...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#840
File: webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T21:15:07.024Z
Learning: The PR Flow API endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no built-in authentication and is designed to be deployed in trusted networks or behind a reverse proxy for security, rather than using API-level authentication mechanisms.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
📚 Learning: in `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_aft...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
📚 Learning: in `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_reques...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
5-5: Line length
Expected: 120; Actual: 259
(MD013, line-length)
- Add Security Model section documenting network-level security controls - Fix code sample URL clarity with example host and helpful comment - Fix markdown lint issue by splitting long line to satisfy 120-char limit Addresses CodeRabbit feedback for improved documentation quality and compliance. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (3)
5-6: Wrap over-long introductory line (MD013)Line 6 exceeds the 120-char guideline flagged by markdownlint. A simple split improves readability without altering meaning.
- The PR Flow API (`/logs/api-pr-flow/{hook_id}`) provides comprehensive pull request workflow visualization data for process analysis and debugging. This endpoint tracks the complete lifecycle of PR processing workflows from webhook receipt through completion. +The PR Flow API (`/logs/api-pr-flow/{hook_id}`) provides comprehensive pull-request workflow visualization data for process analysis and debugging. +It tracks the complete lifecycle of PR processing workflows from webhook receipt through completion.
20-21: Break long sentence in security note (MD013)The single sentence tops 230 chars. Splitting keeps the emphasis while satisfying the linter.
- The PR Flow API endpoints (`/logs/api-pr-flow/*`) are **unauthenticated by design** for simplicity and ease of integration. This endpoint relies on network-level security controls and should only be deployed in trusted environments. +The PR Flow API endpoints (`/logs/api-pr-flow/*`) are **unauthenticated by design** for simplicity and ease of integration. +They rely on network-level security controls and should only be deployed in trusted environments.
37-43: Add blank lines around list (MD032)Markdown requires a blank line before and after lists for proper rendering.
-API consumers should ensure: -- Access is restricted to authorized personnel only -- Network traffic is encrypted in transit (HTTPS) -- Logs containing sensitive data are handled according to data governance policies -- Integration systems implement proper access controls and audit logging +API consumers should ensure: + +- Access is restricted to authorized personnel only +- Network traffic is encrypted in transit (HTTPS) +- Logs containing sensitive data are handled according to data governance policies +- Integration systems implement proper access controls and audit logging +
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
📚 Learning: the pr flow api endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no ...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#840
File: webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T21:15:07.024Z
Learning: The PR Flow API endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no built-in authentication and is designed to be deployed in trusted networks or behind a reverse proxy for security, rather than using API-level authentication mechanisms.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
📚 Learning: in `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_aft...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
📚 Learning: in `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_reques...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
6-6: Line length
Expected: 120; Actual: 147
(MD013, line-length)
20-20: Line length
Expected: 120; Actual: 232
(MD013, line-length)
39-39: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (1)
18-27: Security model section is a welcome improvementThanks for explicitly documenting the unauthenticated-by-design approach and deployment expectations.
This aligns with the architectural decision captured in earlier discussions and removes prior ambiguity.
- Fix markdown line length and formatting issues - Improve code example with better parameter handling - Enhance readability with consistent terminology - Add proper bullet point formatting for better structure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (2)
46-55: Add HTTP verb & media-type to the Parameters sectionReaders have to infer that this is a
GETendpoint returningapplication/json.
Explicitly documenting method and content type improves clarity and aligns with the rest of the project’s API docs.## Parameters + +**Method**: `GET` +**Response Content-Type**: `application/json`
1-5: Wrap long introductory sentence to satisfy markdown-lint (MD013)Line 5 exceeds 120 chars (147); breaking after “visualization data” keeps tooling green and improves readability.
No semantic change required.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
📚 Learning: the pr flow api endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no ...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#840
File: webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T21:15:07.024Z
Learning: The PR Flow API endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no built-in authentication and is designed to be deployed in trusted networks or behind a reverse proxy for security, rather than using API-level authentication mechanisms.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
📚 Learning: in `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_aft...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#612
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:2089-2100
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:09:57.157Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, when the function `_keep_approved_by_approvers_after_rebase` is called, existing approval labels have already been cleared after pushing new changes, so there's no need to check for existing approvals within this function.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
📚 Learning: in `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_reques...
Learnt from: myakove
PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#586
File: webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py:1947-1956
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T09:19:56.185Z
Learning: In `webhook_server_container/libs/github_api.py`, the indentation style used in the `set_pull_request_automerge` method is acceptable as per the project's coding standards.
Applied to files:
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md
5-5: Line length
Expected: 120; Actual: 147
(MD013, line-length)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md (2)
18-36: Security model section looks goodAccurately reflects the “no built-in auth” decision captured in prior discussions and learnings.
5-7: Endpoint path is inconsistent (/logs/api-pr-flowvs/logs/api/pr-flow)Two different spellings of the route appear (hyphen vs. slash after
api).
The FastAPI implementation exposesGET /logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}– using the wrong path in docs will break copy-paste requests.-`/logs/api-pr-flow/{hook_id}` +`/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}`Update both occurrences to keep the documentation accurate.
Also applies to: 20-22
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: myakove PR: myk-org/github-webhook-server#840 File: webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md:17-26 Timestamp: 2025-08-05T21:15:07.024Z Learning: The PR Flow API endpoint (/logs/api/pr-flow/{hook_id}) in webhook_server/docs/pr-flow-api.md has no built-in authentication and is designed to be deployed in trusted networks or behind a reverse proxy for security, rather than using API-level authentication mechanisms.
- Add HTTP method and media-type specification to Parameters section - Wrap long introductory sentence to satisfy markdown-lint MD013 rule These improvements address CodeRabbit AI feedback to enhance API clarity and ensure markdown formatting compliance.
|
New container for ghcr.io/myk-org/github-webhook-server:latest published |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit