DAV3 vs FlashDepth, Comparision

[KolaKater]

DAV3 is much newer than FlashDepth, but from my test FlashDepth is still much better. DAV3 has a big problem, especially with the shapes and vertical lines, increasing depth resolution is not helpf full. Unluckily I don't know how to merge FlashDepth into iw3. Here is my test from today:
DAV3

FlashDepth L

even with FlashDepth S, the shapes of the cables still look good:

[diverswan9]

If you labeled those images correctly... The main differences that I see... the large cable that spans between the two closer buildings, the antennas, and the building to the right seem far more accurate with DA3.

[KolaKater]

@diverswan9 , you are right. Here I have to make it clear, the 3D SBS Image with FlashDepth is from my own program, die Image with DAV3 is from iw3, and from my tests, iw3 has much better depth. If iw3 can supports FlashDepth officially, the FlashDepth models would be the quickist models, and best models especially for videos, it is stabler than VDA

[Jokeru18]

Don't think DA3 Mono is a good refference in current state. For me at least, it breaks the skybox and object near skybox in so many instances. I tried to use it as a teacher but i reverted to DA2.
Flashdepth needs Py torch 2.4 and that makes it somehow incompatible with iw3. I think that's the origin of all the issues i encountered trying to integrate it. Had it running ar one point but the speed was abysmal.

[KolaKater]

Why I like FlashDepth so much is, it keeps the edges/borders well and stable for videos.
DAV3 has oft another problem is with yellow color. For Example:

[KolaKater]

Don't think DA3 Mono is a good refference in current state. For me at least, it breaks the skybox and object near skybox in so many instances. I tried to use it as a teacher but i reverted to DA2. Flashdepth needs Py torch 2.4 and that makes it somehow incompatible with iw3. I think that's the origin of all the issues i encountered trying to integrate it. Had it running ar one point but the speed was abysmal.

if you share me the files, maybe I can improve it

[Jokeru18]

flashdepth_model.py
You can take it from here. This is for S version but I don't really see any advantage over AnyV2. In my testing material it has visual bugs that DA v2 Samll doesn't have.
I took it to a stable place, now runs around 90 fps on RTX 3090 with Torch compile. and 2.5 fps on CPU (5800X3D). The wrapper is tuned for performance not quality. You can ask AI to help you further with the integration and customization

[KolaKater]

Thank you ❤️