Doubt about the number of bands included in scf calculation #230
Unanswered
AnishDas-2025
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Dear Anish, Thank you for your question. "So, is it necessary to fix the nbnd (or the number of wannier centres) in the scf from the 1st step?" I don't think it is. By the way, if you have questions related to QE/Wannier90/EPW, I think the forums of those codes would be the best place to get answers. We only focus on the transport side of things. Best, |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Dear experts,
I have a little doubt. I was going through the Si example given with the code. There I saw that in the scf calculation of the phonon, nbnd is set to be 8 (nbnd=8), which is basically the number of wannier centres used in wannierisation (sp3 for two si atoms in the unit cell. In epw it is nbndsub=8). Is it mandatory to set nbnd in scf while doing the phonon?? We generally don't do scf and phonon thereafter with the fixed nbnd. So, is it necessary to fix the nbnd (or the number of wannier centres) in the scf from the 1st step? I am dealing with metals. I have no doubt about the nbnd in the nscf step.
Thank you in advance
Anish
All reactions