Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 28, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.47

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency version from 3.0.42 to 3.0.47.

This change ensures improved stability and performance for testing within the application.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.47</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the dependency version for nanoFramework.TestFramework in the packages.lock.json file associated with the .NETnanoFramework,Version=v1.0. The version has been changed from 3.0.42 to 3.0.47, and a new content hash has been generated for the updated version. The nanoFramework.CoreLibrary dependency remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/ConfigTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.47

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #122: This PR updates the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency in the same packages.lock.json file, indicating a direct connection in terms of dependency management.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nfbot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57cf2fc and 1e12f7b.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57cf2fc and 1e12f7b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Tests/ConfigTests/ConfigurationTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/ConfigTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Tests/ConfigTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Tests/ConfigTests/packages.lock.json (1)

13-15: Version update looks correct.

The dependency update matches the PR objectives, updating nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.47 with the corresponding content hash.

Let's verify the corresponding project file changes:

✅ Verification successful

Version update is correctly synchronized across all dependency files

The version update to nanoFramework.TestFramework 3.0.47 is consistently reflected in:

  • packages.lock.json
  • packages.config
  • ConfigurationTests.nfproj (Reference section)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the project file's package reference matches the lock file
# Expected: Package reference version should match the lock file version (3.0.47)

# Find and check the corresponding project file
fd -e csproj . Tests/ConfigTests/ --exec grep -l "nanoFramework.TestFramework"

Length of output: 78


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the project file
# First, let's check if the project file exists
fd -e csproj . Tests/ConfigTests/

# Then, let's examine its content if found
fd -e csproj . Tests/ConfigTests/ -x cat {}

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the project structure
# First, list all files in the Tests/ConfigTests directory
ls -la Tests/ConfigTests/

# Also, let's check the parent directory for any project files
ls -la Tests/

Length of output: 666


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Now we can see it's a .nfproj file instead of .csproj
# Let's check both the .nfproj and packages.config files
cat Tests/ConfigTests/ConfigurationTests.nfproj
cat Tests/ConfigTests/packages.config

Length of output: 3513


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 83e4078 into main Nov 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/6f0a5059-cf0a-4051-8b0e-e49831d14532 branch November 28, 2024 00:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants