Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 21, 2025

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.109 to 1.0.112
Bumps nanoFramework.Logging from 1.1.160 to 1.1.161

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated benchmark and logging dependencies to latest available versions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.109 to 1.0.112</br>Bumps nanoFramework.Logging from 1.1.160 to 1.1.161</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Walkthrough

Two direct NuGet package dependencies in the benchmark project lockfile are bumped: nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.109 to 1.0.112 and nanoFramework.Logging from 1.1.160 to 1.1.161. Version numbers and content hashes are updated; no structural or logical changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency version updates
nanoFramework.MessagePack.Benchmark/packages.lock.json
Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark to 1.0.112 and nanoFramework.Logging to 1.1.161; updates resolved versions and contentHash values

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Lockfile updates are mechanical changes with no logic or API surface modifications; verification requires only checking that version numbers and hashes are consistent and versions exist in the package registry.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #13 — Sequential update to nanoFramework.Logging dependency in the same lockfile; both PRs follow a similar pattern of version bumping.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Update 2 NuGet dependencies' directly and accurately describes the main change: bumping two NuGet package versions in the lockfile.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch nfbot/update-dependencies/6fb74f19-526c-4289-8dff-0f97b87d7735

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5da468 and 9a3415c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • nanoFramework.MessagePack.Benchmark/nanoFramework.MessagePack.Benchmark.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.MessagePack.Benchmark/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • nanoFramework.MessagePack.Benchmark/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
nanoFramework.MessagePack.Benchmark/packages.lock.json (2)

7-9: Approve nanoFramework.Benchmark update to 1.0.112.

The version increment from 1.0.109 to 1.0.112 is a patch-level update. The contentHash is updated appropriately for the new version.

Please verify that nanoFramework.Benchmark 1.0.112 has no known security vulnerabilities and is stable.


25-27: Approve nanoFramework.Logging update to 1.1.161.

The version increment from 1.1.160 to 1.1.161 is a patch-level update. The contentHash is updated appropriately for the new version.

Please verify that nanoFramework.Logging 1.1.161 has no known security vulnerabilities and is stable.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit e14841f into main Nov 21, 2025
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/6fb74f19-526c-4289-8dff-0f97b87d7735 branch November 21, 2025 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants