Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Apr 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the Manifesto section with a clickable hyperlink for the Linus Torvalds quote.
    • Added a new "Structure" section featuring an embedded image and caption to illustrate the project structure and application flow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The README.md file was updated to improve the Manifesto section by converting the Linus Torvalds quote attribution into a clickable hyperlink referencing an archived web source. Additionally, a new "Structure" section was added, featuring an embedded image that visually represents the project's conceptual structure and main application flow, along with a descriptive caption. No other documentation or command changes were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md Enhanced the Manifesto section with a hyperlink for the Linus Torvalds quote; added a new Structure section with an embedded image and descriptive caption.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram is generated as the changes are limited to documentation updates and do not affect application control flow or features.

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (fec91d2) 1068 196 18.35%
Head commit (1958b05) 1068 (+0) 196 (+0) 18.35% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#217) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fec91d2 and 1958b05.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • assets/images/Structure.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

15-15: Properly formatted hyperlink in Manifesto section
The Linus Torvalds attribution is now a clickable hyperlink pointing to the archived source, and the Markdown syntax is correct. Great job!

Comment on lines +21 to +26
## Structure

![Structure](/assets/images/Structure.svg)

_Figure: Simplified, conceptual project structure and main application flow. Not all dependencies are shown._

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Enhance accessibility and verify the diagram asset
The new “Structure” section adds valuable context, but the image’s alt text is very generic (“Structure”). For screen-reader users, consider a more descriptive label (e.g., “Project conceptual structure and application flow diagram”). Also, please confirm that assets/images/Structure.svg is present in the repository and up‑to‑date by running the following check:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the Structure diagram exists
if [ ! -f assets/images/Structure.svg ]; then
  echo "ERROR: assets/images/Structure.svg not found"
  exit 1
else
  echo "✅ assets/images/Structure.svg found"
fi

Length of output: 125


Update alt text for better accessibility
The diagram asset exists at assets/images/Structure.svg (✅ verified), but the current alt text (“Structure”) is too generic. Please update it to a more descriptive label to aid screen‑reader users.

• File: README.md (Structure section)
• Replace the image line with something like:

- ![Structure](/assets/images/Structure.svg)
+ ![Project conceptual structure and application flow diagram](/assets/images/Structure.svg)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## Structure
![Structure](/assets/images/Structure.svg)
_Figure: Simplified, conceptual project structure and main application flow. Not all dependencies are shown._
## Structure
![Project conceptual structure and application flow diagram](/assets/images/Structure.svg)
_Figure: Simplified, conceptual project structure and main application flow. Not all dependencies are shown._

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (fec91d2) to head (1958b05).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #217   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines          183       183           
  Branches        14        14           
=========================================
  Hits           183       183           
Components Coverage Δ
Controllers 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Services 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit 5eb5ebc into master Apr 17, 2025
24 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/deps-diagram branch April 17, 2025 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create simplified dependency diagram with Lucidchart and add it to README

2 participants