Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented May 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to automatically build and push Docker images to the GitHub Container Registry after coverage checks.
  • Documentation
    • Fixed formatting in the README to properly close a code block after the Docker run command.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 4, 2025

Walkthrough

A new container job was added to the GitHub Actions workflow in .github/workflows/dotnet.yml. This job executes after the coverage job, logs into the GitHub Container Registry, sets up Docker Buildx, and builds and pushes a Docker image with multiple tags. Additionally, the README.md file was updated to correctly close a previously unclosed code block after a Docker run command.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summary
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml Added a container job to the workflow for Docker login, Buildx setup, and Docker image build/push.
README.md Added a missing closing triple backtick to properly terminate a code block after a Docker command.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant GitHub Container Registry
    participant Docker Buildx

    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run coverage job
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Start container job (after coverage)
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Container Registry: Login using GitHub actor and token
    GitHub Actions->>Docker Buildx: Set up Docker Buildx
    GitHub Actions->>Docker Buildx: Build Docker image
    Docker Buildx->>GitHub Container Registry: Push image with tags (latest, main, SHA)
Loading

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6c29b5 and 2a43eca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dotnet.yml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/dotnet.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented May 4, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (9d0b531) 1068 196 18.35%
Head commit (2a43eca) 1068 (+0) 196 (+0) 18.35% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#231) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (4)

108-111: Container job declaration: The new container job correctly depends on coverage and runs on ubuntu-latest. To avoid unintentionally pushing images from pull requests, consider adding a condition such as:

if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' }}

at the job level.


116-119: Checkout step security: The actions/checkout@v4 step by default persists the GITHUB_TOKEN, which could grant broader access than needed. It’s recommended to add:

- uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    persist-credentials: false

and rely on your explicit Docker login step for authentication.


127-129: Docker Buildx setup: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 prepares Buildx for advanced builds. If you plan to publish multi-architecture images, consider specifying platforms: in the subsequent build step (e.g., linux/amd64,linux/arm64).


131-139: Build and push Docker image: The docker/build-push-action@v5 configuration correctly pushes the image with latest, main, and sha-${{ github.sha }} tags. For improved performance, you may enable build caching (cache-from/cache-to) and explicitly define platforms.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d0b531 and c6c29b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (1)

49-51: Close the Markdown code block: Added the missing closing triple backticks to properly terminate the code block after the docker run command. This ensures the README renders correctly.

.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (2)

112-115: Job-level permissions: Granting contents: read and packages: write is appropriate for checking out code and pushing images to GHCR. Necessary permissions are in place.


120-126: GHCR login step: Using docker/login-action@v3 with registry: ghcr.io and the GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication is correct and secure.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 5, 2025

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit a37b92e into master May 5, 2025
19 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/ghcr branch May 5, 2025 00:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update GitHub Actions workflow to build & publish Docker image to GHCR

2 participants