feature/dotfiles

[nanotaboada]

This change is 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Reorganized and updated the project status indicators for clearer visibility of build and quality metrics.

• Chores

  • Adjusted automated dependency update checks to run daily for more timely maintenance.
  • Streamlined internal configuration comments to improve clarity without affecting functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request makes several configuration and documentation adjustments. A URL comment was added to the Codacy configuration file, while guidance comments were removed from the Codecov configuration file. The Dependabot configuration now checks for updates daily instead of weekly for both Maven and GitHub Actions. The README has been reorganized by removing certain badges and introducing a new "Quality Gate Status" badge, along with a rearranged order for displaying status badges.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.codacy.yml, codecov.yml	Updated informational comments: a URL link was added in .codacy.yml and extraneous guidance comments were removed from codecov.yml; functionality remains unchanged.
.github/dependabot.yml	Modified schedule intervals: update intervals for the "maven" and "github-actions" ecosystems changed from "weekly" to "daily".
README.md	Reorganized status badges: removed "Bugs" and "Maintainability" badges, added a "Quality Gate Status" badge, and rearranged badge order to improve clarity.

Possibly related PRs

• chore: update status badges #163: Involves modifications to status badges within the README.md file that are directly related to the badge reorganization changes in this PR.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d5b825 and e5bcb86.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .codacy.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
• README.md (1 hunks)
• codecov.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

README.md

[style] ~5-~5: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2485 characters long)
Context: ...pring.boot/actions/workflows/maven.yml) [![CodeFactor](https://www.codefactor.io/r...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

🔇 Additional comments (5)

.github/dependabot.yml (2)

8-8: Updated Maven schedule interval to daily.
The "maven" package ecosystem now updates daily rather than weekly, which aligns with the PR objective of more frequent dependency checks.

---

16-16: Updated GitHub Actions schedule interval to daily.
The "github-actions" package ecosystem now uses a daily update interval, ensuring quicker dependency updates and better alignment with project maintenance goals.

.codacy.yml (1)

1-2: Added Codacy documentation reference.
The new comment providing a URL to the Codacy configuration documentation is purely informational and helps future maintainers understand the file context.

README.md (1)

5-10: Reorganized status badges in README.
The new "Quality Gate Status" badge has been added and the order of the badges has been rearranged to enhance clarity of project status metrics. Please verify that all badge links correctly reflect the latest project information.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~5-~5: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2485 characters long)
Context: ...pring.boot/actions/workflows/maven.yml) [![CodeFactor](https://www.codefactor.io/r...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

codecov.yml (1)

1-1: Streamlined Codecov configuration file.
Extraneous comment lines have been removed from this file, leaving a cleaner configuration without any impact on functionality.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[qlty-cloud-legacy]

Code Climate has analyzed commit e5bcb86 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1d5b825)	57	57	100.00%
Head commit (e5bcb86)	57 (+0)	57 (+0)	100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#170)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.49%. Comparing base (1d5b825) to head (e5bcb86).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #170   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     96.49%   96.49%           
  Complexity       24       24           
=========================================
  Files             2        2           
  Lines            57       57           
  Branches          6        6           
=========================================
  Hits             55       55           
  Partials          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.