Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Nov 25, 2025

  • Add table of contents for easier navigation
  • Expand About section with detailed feature showcase
  • Add Prerequisites section with JDK 21 requirement and setup instructions
  • Add Getting Started section with local development and Docker deployment steps
  • Add API Reference with complete endpoint table and request/response schemas
  • Add Testing and Documentation sections
  • Restructure License and Acknowledgments sections
  • Add MIT License badge

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation

  • Documentation
    • Comprehensive README updates with expanded project features and architecture overview
    • Enhanced Getting Started section with detailed local development, build, and deployment instructions
    • Added API reference table and layer responsibilities documentation for improved clarity

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

- Add table of contents for easier navigation
- Expand About section with detailed feature showcase
- Add Prerequisites section with JDK 21 requirement and setup instructions
- Add Getting Started section with local development and Docker deployment steps
- Add API Reference with complete endpoint table and request/response schemas
- Add Testing and Documentation sections
- Restructure License and Acknowledgments sections
- Add MIT License badge
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The README undergoes comprehensive restructuring and expansion, transitioning from a minimal project overview to a production-ready documentation guide. Updates include rebranding, project badges, detailed feature descriptions, expanded prerequisites with JDK 21 requirements, enhanced Getting Started instructions with build and deployment steps, API reference tables, and new sections covering testing, documentation, and contribution guidelines.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
README Enhancement
README.md
Rebranded project title; added badges and MIT license badge; expanded About section with architecture and technology details; replaced Structure section with Features list (REST API, Clean Architecture, Validation, Caching, API Documentation, Health Monitoring, Testing, Docker, CI/CD); added Layer Responsibilities subsection; updated prerequisites to require JDK 21 with compatibility notes and macOS JAVA_HOME guidance; rewrote Getting Started with explicit local development, build, run, and test commands plus Docker deployment path; introduced API Reference table with CRUD endpoints and sample BookDTO JSON schema; expanded Testing section with coverage and tooling details; added Documentation, Contributing, and License sections.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Review effort is minimal as changes are purely documentation updates with no code logic modifications
  • Content is predominantly additive and reorganizational, following standard README best practices
  • Verification needed only for factual accuracy of prerequisites (JDK 21 requirement, macOS JAVA_HOME guidance) and consistency of command examples with actual project structure

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: modernize README with comprehensive documentation' directly aligns with the main change: a comprehensive overhaul of the README documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/enhance-README

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (0246f1c) 49 49 100.00%
Head commit (1d87e21) 49 (+0) 49 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#230) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0246f1c) to head (1d87e21).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              master      #230   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        20        20           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines             49        49           
  Branches           4         4           
===========================================
  Hits              49        49           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

178-178: Platform-specific command: open is macOS-only.

Line 178 uses the open command to view the JaCoCo report, which only works on macOS. Consider adding platform-agnostic alternatives for Linux/Windows users:

- open target/site/jacoco/index.html
+ # macOS: open target/site/jacoco/index.html
+ # Linux: xdg-open target/site/jacoco/index.html
+ # Windows: start target/site/jacoco/index.html

Alternatively, document the manual file access method for cross-platform users.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0246f1c and 1d87e21.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T16:16:19.398Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/java.samples.spring.boot PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T16:16:19.398Z
Learning: Applies to **/{controllers,services}/*.java : Use `BookDTO` for API requests/responses; `Book` entity is internal and should not be exposed directly

Applied to files:

  • README.md
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~199-~199: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...1/actuator- **Agent Onboarding**: See.github/copilot-instructions.md` for developmen...

(GITHUB)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)

12-26: Well-organized Table of Contents.

The TOC is comprehensive and properly linked, making navigation effortless for users. Good structural foundation for the documentation.


53-64: Architecture section properly highlights DTO usage.

Lines 61-62 correctly emphasize that Services handle Entity-DTO mapping, reinforcing the best practice of not exposing domain entities directly to clients. This aligns well with the codebase's design principles.


81-133: Clear Getting Started instructions with proper subsection organization.

The local development (lines 83-108) and Docker deployment (lines 109-133) sections provide step-by-step guidance with appropriate port references (9000, 9001). The separation between detached and foreground modes for Docker is helpful.


167-193: Testing section covers coverage targets and naming conventions.

The section appropriately distinguishes between unit testing approaches (lines 183-186) and coverage targets (lines 188-192), providing developers with clear expectations for test implementation and coverage metrics.


1-218: Comprehensive, production-ready documentation restructuring.

The modernized README effectively transforms the project documentation from minimal to comprehensive. Key strengths:

  • ✅ Clear architecture and layer responsibility descriptions (aligns with retrieved learnings about BookDTO usage)
  • ✅ Explicit JDK 21 requirement with compatibility warnings
  • ✅ Step-by-step local development and Docker deployment paths
  • ✅ Well-formatted API Reference table with realistic JSON schema
  • ✅ Proper cross-linking and section organization

All PR objectives are thoroughly addressed. The only actionable items are verifying cross-file references and adding platform-agnostic guidance for the coverage report viewer.

- **API Documentation**: Swagger UI at `http://localhost:9000/swagger/index.html`
- **OpenAPI Spec**: Available at `http://localhost:9000/v3/api-docs`
- **Actuator Endpoints**: `http://localhost:9001/actuator`
- **Agent Onboarding**: See `.github/copilot-instructions.md` for development guidelines
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify referenced files exist in the repository.

The README references external files that must be present for the documentation to be complete:

  • .github/copilot-instructions.md (line 199)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md (line 203)
  • assets/images/structure.svg (line 55)
  • assets/images/swagger.png (line 165)

Run the following script to verify these files are present in the repository:

Also verify that docker-compose.yml exists to support the Docker Deployment instructions (lines 109-127).

Also applies to: 203-203


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify referenced files exist in the repository

files_to_check=(
  ".github/copilot-instructions.md"
  "CONTRIBUTING.md"
  "assets/images/structure.svg"
  "assets/images/swagger.png"
  "docker-compose.yml"
)

echo "Checking for referenced files..."
for file in "${files_to_check[@]}"; do
  if [ -f "$file" ]; then
    echo "✓ Found: $file"
  else
    echo "✗ Missing: $file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 200


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines 109-127 from README.md to check docker-compose.yml reference
sed -n '109,127p' README.md

Length of output: 179


docker-compose.yml is missing and required to support documented Docker Deployment instructions.

The README's Docker Deployment section (lines 109–127) provides commands like docker compose up that expect a docker-compose.yml file to exist in the repository root. Without it, users following the documentation will encounter failures. The file must be created to make the Docker Deployment instructions functional.

All other referenced files (.github/copilot-instructions.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, assets/images/structure.svg, assets/images/swagger.png) are present and valid.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~199-~199: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...1/actuator- **Agent Onboarding**: See.github/copilot-instructions.md` for developmen...

(GITHUB)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 199, the Docker Deployment instructions reference
running docker compose up but the repository lacks a docker-compose.yml; add a
docker-compose.yml at the repository root that defines the services, networks,
volumes and environment variables required by the README commands (e.g., app
service built from the project, any database or reverse-proxy services, ports,
and compose v2 syntax), ensure it matches the commands and paths in the README
(including any build context, ports, and env file names), and commit the new
file so the documented docker compose commands succeed.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify compose.yaml exists in the repository
if [ -f "compose.yaml" ]; then
  echo "✓ Found: compose.yaml"
  echo ""
  echo "File contents preview:"
  head -20 compose.yaml
else
  echo "✗ Missing: compose.yaml"
fi

Length of output: 356


@nanotaboada, you're absolutely right, and I apologize for the oversight!

The compose.yaml file does exist in the repository, and it's the modern, recommended naming convention for Docker Compose files. Both compose.yaml and docker-compose.yml are valid, but Docker's documentation now favors compose.yaml.

I've verified the file, and it correctly defines the service with ports 9000 and 9001 as documented in your README. The Docker Deployment instructions are fully supported. Thank you for the clarification and the helpful link!


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: nanotaboada
Repo: nanotaboada/java.samples.spring.boot PR: 230
File: README.md:199-199
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:07:29.192Z
Learning: This repository uses `compose.yaml` (not `docker-compose.yml`) for Docker Compose configuration, which is the modern naming convention supported by Docker Compose.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.


🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/java.samples.spring.boot PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T16:16:19.398Z
Learning: Applies to **/{controllers,services}/*.java : Use `BookDTO` for API requests/responses; `Book` entity is internal and should not be exposed directly

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/java.samples.spring.boot PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T16:16:19.398Z
Learning: Applies to **/controllers/*.java : Annotate REST controller methods with `Operation` and `ApiResponses` for OpenAPI/Swagger documentation

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/java.samples.spring.boot PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T16:16:19.398Z
Learning: Applies to docker-compose.yml : Use Docker Compose for local containerized deployment with exposed ports 9000 (API) and 9001 (Actuator)

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit cdc3194 into master Nov 25, 2025
17 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/enhance-README branch November 25, 2025 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants