Conversation
brisvag
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about grouping highlights with another level of headers? We have quite a few features and quite a few performance highlights that I feel like could be separated as such.
Co-authored-by: Lorenzo Gaifas <brisvag@gmail.com>
@brisvag yeah I had the same thought. Not all of the changes fit into neat buckets so I'll have a think about grouping. |
|
Not sure it's worth mentioning but Shapes layers with many shapes are in a much better place in 0.7.0 still a long way to go because drawing and moving shapes is still bad, but it's some progress anyways. |
|
@psobolewskiPhD is it easy for you to give me a list of the relevant PRs? If not I'll hunt them down, but I think we missed marking them as highlight |
|
It's basically all the Shapes ones in Performance section:
These all revolve around selection,interacting (pan zoom), and deleting for Shapes layers with many shapes, blocking is mostly eliminated. I suspect these don't impact too many users right now, because overall we don't support these use cases well still, but it's a step in the direction. So maybe more something for image.sc post than release notes 🤷 |
|
@psobolewskiPhD 🙏. These release notes are still not final, and there's a couple of TODOs anyway, so we can either merge now, or leave this open until it's complete. I just thought it would be easier to review as we go. I've added the grouping issue and the shapes PRs to the TODOs |
References and relevant issues
Description
There are still a couple of PRs in-flight, and a couple I didn't get a chance to update today, but I wanted to get this PR in so we can at least get closer to full release notes for 0.7.0, and make review somewhat easier!