Skip to content

Conversation

@jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the contribution
Remaining bundle updates for open source release

@jphickey jphickey force-pushed the draco-integration branch 2 times, most recently from 14ed2b8 to fc32f29 Compare January 23, 2026 17:08
@keegan-moore
Copy link
Contributor

Can you create an issue to commit this stuff under?
It's a best practice to reference an issue number in all commits.
That might actually be necessary anyway to pass our commit format pipeline check.

@dzbaker dzbaker changed the title Additional bundle updates for Draco open source release Fix #469, Additional bundle updates for Draco open source release Jan 23, 2026
@dzbaker
Copy link
Contributor

dzbaker commented Jan 23, 2026

Can you create an issue to commit this stuff under? It's a best practice to reference an issue number in all commits. That might actually be necessary anyway to pass our commit format pipeline check.

I went ahead and updated the PR to reference our issue for repository cleanup.

@dzbaker dzbaker merged commit b4ec679 into main Jan 23, 2026
35 of 37 checks passed
@keegan-moore
Copy link
Contributor

Can you create an issue to commit this stuff under? It's a best practice to reference an issue number in all commits. That might actually be necessary anyway to pass our commit format pipeline check.

I went ahead and updated the PR to reference our issue for repository cleanup.

Looks like the tools are connecting it to #469 (not our internal issues).
Not sure how to differentiate them. Perhaps we wouldn't need to if we moved our open-source update issue tracking back out to github.com. I've got some ideas about this that might help.

@dzbaker
Copy link
Contributor

dzbaker commented Jan 23, 2026

Can you create an issue to commit this stuff under? It's a best practice to reference an issue number in all commits. That might actually be necessary anyway to pass our commit format pipeline check.

I went ahead and updated the PR to reference our issue for repository cleanup.

Looks like the tools are connecting it to #469 (not our internal issues). Not sure how to differentiate them. Perhaps we wouldn't need to if we moved our open-source update issue tracking back out to github.com. I've got some ideas about this that might help.

Yeah, I have some ideas that I want to discuss with you about handling that long term.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants