Add comment for intentional duplicated monospace font

[fritx]

#480
https://github.com/necolas/normalize.css#pre-code-kbd-samp

I was confused until I found the answer, so it's better to add this missing comment ;)

[7studio]

👍

[kevinvanrijn]

This should definitely be added. It's pretty obvious that there's confusion why it's there with it being asked at least 12 times now in: #196, #293, #295, #326, #328, #335, #346, #347, #374, #415, #476 and #480.

[fritx]

wow~ 👍

[battaglr]

It will certainly reduce the number of issues opened by this. 👍

[cvrebert]

It's spelled "preformatted" with two Ts.

[fritx]

Damn. Just had it copied from here: https://github.com/necolas/normalize.css#pre-code-kbd-samp ..Whatever ;)

[jonathantneal]

@fritx, great work. Merged in 5daad01! @KIPdeKIP, @battaglr, there go all the easy issues to close. 😝

[battaglr]

@jonathantneal: awesome! If I can be of any help with the remaining issues, just let me know!

[jonathantneal]

Thanks, @battaglr! I’m trying to resolve every PR from oldest to newest. If you want to tackle any one of them, let me know. Then we move onto issues.

[fritx]

Awesome!

[HelderMagalhaes]

Just bumped into this. Seeing duplicated default classes in optimized CSS files is unexpected, so I ended up here on investigating. A straight duplication is intentional comment next to monospace, monospace occurrences was better IMO to avoid confused users and erroneous error reports. Should an additional issue be created or could this still "fit" this 5yo one?