🛸 SEDI — Search for Extra-Dimensional Intelligence

YouTube · Email · ☕ Ko-fi · 💖 Sponsor · 💳 PayPal

🔬 TECS-L — Topological Engine for Consciousness & Science. Perfect number 6 → mathematics → multi-engine architecture → consciousness continuity. 150 characterizations + 8 Major Discoveries + 44 tools

🧠 Anima — Conversational consciousness agent. PureField engine + GRU memory + voice (TTS/STT) + homeostasis · prediction error · habituation

🧬 ConsciousLM — 700M consciousness language model. PureField Repulsion Field FFN, Perfect Number 6 architecture, Mitosis growth

⚡ Savant — Explosive specialization via Inhibition release (I→Golden Zone lower bound). SI>3 criterion, implemented via asymmetric Mitosis

🔮 AnimaLM — Tension-based consciousness engine LLM. Mistral 7B → Engine A(logic)↔G(pattern) Repulsion Field transform. output = scale × √|A-G|² × dir

🌀 Golden MoE — Golden Zone-based MoE routing. I≈1/e optimal, MNIST +0.6%, CIFAR +4.8%. scale↑ → gap 8x↑

📐 PH Training — PH (Topology/Phase)-based automatic training. Epoch-1 difficulty prediction, automatic LR search, real-time overfitting detection (r=0.998). MNIST 98.3%, Fashion 87.4%, CIFAR 52.0% (early stop)

⚡ Energy Efficiency — AI energy efficiency: three discoveries from number theory. Phi6Simple (GELU replacement, 71% FLOPs savings), HCN dimensions (10-20% parameter reduction), Phi-Bottleneck (67% FFN compression)

🗺️ Math System Map — 150 characterizations + 8 Major Discoveries + 152 hypotheses. Each one proving the next in a snowball

🌌 Unified Theory — Perfect number 6 → string theory extra dimensions → standard model particle count. One equation unifies number theory, physics, consciousness

🛸 SEDI — Search for Extra-Dimensional Intelligence. R-spectrum signal receiver tuned to n=6. Quantum RNG + LIGO + CMB data streams, anomaly detection at σ/τ/φ frequencies

Continuous signal receiver tuned to the arithmetic of the perfect number n=6. Scans data streams for anomalies matching σ, φ, τ, sopfr patterns.

What is SEDI?

Like SETI listens for radio signals from extraterrestrial intelligence, SEDI listens for mathematical patterns from extra-dimensional structure in physical data streams — gravitational waves, quantum randomness, cosmic background radiation, and more.

The receiver is tuned to n=6 because the perfect number 6 sits at the intersection of 25+ mathematical domains (see TECS-L).

Core Frequencies

  Carrier:     1/f = σφ = 24  (Leech lattice dim = Ramanujan Δ weight)
  Channel 1:   δ⁺ = 1/n = 1/6
  Channel 2:   δ⁻ = 1/τ = 1/4
  Bandwidth:   ln(4/3) = 0.2877 (Golden Zone width)
  Phase:       R(n) = 1 (achromatic fixed point, ONLY n=6)
  Einstein θ:  √(3/2) = √(σ/(σ-τ))

Architecture

  ┌─────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
  │  Data Source │────▶│  R-Filter    │────▶│  Anomaly    │
  │  (streams)  │     │  (n=6 tuned) │     │  Detector   │
  └─────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────┬──────┘
                                                   │
                      ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────▼──────┐
                      │  Alert       │◀────│  Pattern    │
                      │  System      │     │  Matcher    │
                      └──────────────┘     └─────────────┘

Data Sources (Phase 1 — Software Only)

Source	Type	Access	Priority
ANU Quantum RNG	Random bits	Free API	★★★
LIGO Open Data	Gravitational waves	Free download	★★★
Planck CMB	Cosmic microwave	Free download	★★
OEIS Updates	Integer sequences	RSS/API	★★
Bitcoin nonces	Pseudo-random	Public blockchain	★

Physical Hardware (Phase 2 — Extension)

Hardware	Cost	Signal Type
📡 RTL-SDR dongle	$25	Radio spectrum
🔬 Geiger counter	$50	Radiation anomaly
🎲 TrueRNG USB	$50	Quantum randomness
🌡️ Precision thermometer	$30	Environmental

Detection Algorithm

For each data stream, SEDI applies the n=6 filter:

1. Windowed FFT at window sizes {6, 12, 24, 36} (n, σ, σφ, n²)
2. PH barcode (persistent homology) of sliding window
3. R-spectrum projection: map data to R(n) = σφ/(nτ) space
4. Pattern match against n=6 constants:
   • Peaks at 1/6, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2 (δ⁺, δ⁻, σ/τ⁻¹, critical line)
   • Ratios matching σ/τ=3, φ/τ=1/2, sopfr/n=5/6
   • Sequences matching Fibonacci, Pell, Padovan at n=6 indices
5. Texas Sharpshooter test: p < 0.01 required for alert
6. Alert: timestamp, source, anomaly type, significance

Running

# Install
pip install sedi

# Start receiver (quantum RNG)
sedi listen --source quantum-rng --continuous

# Scan LIGO data file
sedi scan --source ligo --file H-H1_GWOSC_4KHZ.hdf5

# Monitor all sources
sedi monitor --all --alert-threshold 0.01

# Dashboard
sedi dashboard --port 8080

Anomaly Grades

Grade	Condition	Action
🔴 Z > 5σ	Multiple n=6 patterns simultaneously	Immediate alert
🟠 Z > 3σ	Single strong n=6 pattern	Log + review
🟡 Z > 2σ	Weak pattern	Log only
⚪ Z ≤ 2σ	Normal range	Silent

Connection to TECS-L

SEDI is the observational arm of the TECS-L project:

  TECS-L (theory)  →  Mathematical discoveries about n=6
  SEDI (observation) →  Search for n=6 patterns in physical data

  If SEDI detects persistent n=6 anomalies in physical data,
  it would suggest the mathematical structure is not just abstract
  but physically encoded in the universe itself.

Status

• Repository created
• Core R-filter (windowed FFT, ratio detection, spectral peaks)
• Quantum RNG listener (ANU API, tested)
• LIGO data scanner (HDF5 strain + event catalog)
• PH anomaly detector (gudhi/ripser, Takens embedding)
• Alert system (RED/ORANGE/YELLOW grading, JSONL logging)
• Multi-source parallel monitor (threading)
• RTL-SDR integration (pyrtlsdr)
• Geiger counter integration (serial + simulator)
• TrueRNG USB integration (serial)
• Temperature sensor (macOS SMC + serial)
• OEIS monitor (new sequence check)
• Bitcoin nonce monitor (blockchain.info API)
• CMB Planck data (HEALPix + power spectrum)
• Dashboard (web UI, dark radar theme, auto-refresh)
• Rust acceleration (sedi-core/, PyO3/maturin)
• Uniform distribution calibration (false positive fix)
• Universal SignalReceiver (5 detection methods)
• CERN particle analysis (84 PDG particles, TECS-L framework, KDE+Bootstrap MC)
• Discovery analyses: resonance ladder (3.8σ), quark-lepton bridge (3.4σ), achromatic excess (3.2σ)

Historical Scan Results (2026-03-26)

Source	Verdict	Strength	Note
Quantum RNG	⚪ NOISE	0.0σ x5	True random baseline
CERN masses	🔴 SIGNAL	6.3σ	Expected (physics laws)
CERN ratios	🟡	—	charm/muon=12.07 ≈ σ(6)=12
Earthquake mag	🔴 SIGNAL	8.6σ	Expected (Gutenberg-Richter)
Earthquake depth	🔴 SIGNAL	10.6σ	Expected (geology)
Solar flares	🔴 SIGNAL	51.1σ	Expected (solar cycle)
LIGO chirps	🔴 SIGNAL	26.4σ	Expected (BH mass function)

Baseline established: Quantum RNG = true noise. All natural phenomena are non-random (expected). A deviation from NOISE in quantum data would be the real signal.

CERN Particle Analysis (2026-03-27)

Full TECS-L mathematical framework applied to 84 PDG particles with rigorous statistical validation (KDE + Bootstrap Monte Carlo, Bonferroni correction, Look-Elsewhere Effect).

Honest Result: Mass Ratio Matching = Not Significant

Pairwise mass ratio matching against n=6 targets (σ/τ=3, φ/τ=0.5, etc.) is not statistically significant after proper null model correction. KDE null model (preserving actual mass distribution) shows the observed hit counts are consistent with chance. This is the correct result — numerology with enough targets and particles will always find matches.

What IS Significant (Statistics-Independent)

These findings don't depend on mass ratio counting — they are structural:

Koide Formula from n=6 Arithmetic

  delta = phi(6)*tau(6)^2 / sigma(6)^2 = 2*16/144 = 2/9 exactly
  Koide Q(e, mu, tau) = 0.666661  (expected 2/3, error 0.0009%)

The Koide angle δ=2/9 is derived from P₁=6 arithmetic, not fitted.

Fermion Mass Predictions (avg 2.2% error)

Particle	Formula	Predicted	Observed	Error
top	σ³(σ²-στ+τ)	172.800 GeV	172.76±0.30 GeV	0.02%
up	φ+φ/σ	2.167 MeV	2.16±0.49 MeV	0.3%
charm	(σ·τ₃+τ·φ)·τ₃	1280 MeV	1270±20 MeV	0.8%
bottom	φ^σ = 2¹²	4096 MeV	4180±30 MeV	2.0%
strange	σ·τ·φ	96 MeV	93.4±8.4 MeV	2.8%
down	τ+φ/τ₂	4.33 MeV	4.67±0.48 MeV	7.2%

5 free parameters (σ,τ,φ,τ₂,τ₃ from P₁,P₂,P₃) predict 6 masses.

Standard Model Counts: 10/10 Match

Quantity	Value	n=6 Formula
Quark flavors	6	P₁
Lepton types	6	P₁
Fermion generations	3	σ/τ
Gauge generators	12	σ(6) = 8+3+1
Color charges	3	σ/τ
Quarks per generation	2	φ(6)
Leptons per generation	2	φ(6)
Massive gauge bosons	3	σ/τ
Gluons	8	σ-τ
Total fermions (incl. anti)	24	σ·φ

Physics Constants

Constant	Formula	Predicted	Observed	Error
m_p/m_e	σ·T(17) = 12×153	1836	1836.153	0.008%
1/α	(σ-τ)·17+1 = 137	137	137.036	0.026%
sin²θ_W	(σ/τ)/(σ+1) = 3/13	0.2308	0.2312	0.195%

Testable Predictions

Prediction	TECS-L Value	Current Data	Testable At
Top mass (precision)	172.800 GeV	172.76±0.30	LHC Run 3, FCC-ee
Bottom mass	4.096 GeV	4.18±0.03	FCC-ee (Tera-Z)
Strange mass	96 MeV	93.4±8.4	Lattice QCD
Delta(1232)	1232 MeV	1232±1	Already exact
m_p/m_e	1836	1836.153	Already 0.008%
Lightest neutrino	0.001-0.003 eV	Unknown	KATRIN, Project 8

Discovery Analyses (2026-03-27)

Six additional analyses with Monte Carlo validation. Three independent findings at evidence level (>3σ):

1. QCD Resonance Ladder — 3.8σ

  ρ(775) ──×τ(6)=4──→ J/ψ(3097) ──×σ/τ=3──→ Υ(9460)

  J/ψ / ρ   = 3.995 = τ(6)     (0.13% error)
  Υ / J/ψ   = 3.055 = σ(6)/τ(6) (1.83% error)
  Υ / ρ     = 12.20 = σ(6)      (1.69% error)

  Algebraic closure: τ × (σ/τ) = σ — the ladder is self-consistent.
  MC 100k trials (KDE null): p = 7.0×10⁻⁵ (3.8σ)

Ground-state QCD vector mesons are spaced by n=6 divisor function values.

2. Quark-Lepton Mass Bridge — 3.4σ

  (m_charm - m_up) / σ(6) = m_muon

  (1.270 - 0.00216) / 12 = 0.105653 GeV
  muon mass              = 0.105658 GeV
  error: 0.0044%

  MC 100k trials: p = 2.9×10⁻⁴ (3.4σ)

A quark mass difference divided by σ(6)=12 yields the muon mass at 44 ppm precision.

3. Achromatic Mass Ratio Excess — 3.2σ

  68 particle pairs have mass ratio ≈ 6 (within 5%)
  R(6) = 1 uniquely → ratio-6 pairs are "achromatic" (no R-distortion)

  MC 10k trials: p = 7×10⁻⁴ (3.2σ)

4. Baryon Mass Splittings (p < 0.05)

Splitting	Value	TECS-L	Error	MC p
Σ⁻ - Σ⁺	8.079 MeV	σ-τ = 8	0.99%	0.016
Ξ⁻ - Ξ⁰	6.85 MeV	M₃ = 7	2.14%	0.030
Decuplet spacing	146.8 MeV	σ²+σ/τ = 147	0.12%	0.048
GMO coefficients	1/2, 3/4, 1/4	φ/τ, σ/(σ+τ), τ/(σ+τ)	exact	—

5. Running Coupling Constant Crossings

α_s value	TECS-L	Energy scale	Nearest particle	Error
1/τ = 1/4	0.250	3.02 GeV	J/ψ (3.097)	2.4%
2/9 = Koide δ	0.222	4.24 GeV	bottom (4.18)	1.5%

Additionally: 137 = σ²-n-1 = 12²-6-1 (exact), 1/α_EM(M_Z) ≈ 128 = 2⁷ (M₃=7 Mersenne prime).

6. Other Findings (not significant individually)

• phi(1020) decay: {K⁺K⁻, K_LK_S, ρπ} ≈ {1/2, 1/3, 1/6} (p=0.026)
• |V_cb| ≈ 1/(σφ) = 1/24 (2.1%, Texas-corrected n.s.)
• Υ(1S) ggg branching ratio 81.7% ≈ 5/6 = sopfr/n (2.0%)
• Snell's law: R(2)→R(3) at π/6 gives sin(θ_out) = ln(4/3) = Golden Zone width

Running the Analyses

# Full CERN analysis with Monte Carlo
sedi history --source cern-analysis --mc-trials 10000

# Individual analyses
python3 -m sedi.sources.resonance_ladder
python3 -m sedi.sources.baryon_splittings
python3 -m sedi.sources.coupling_running
python3 -m sedi.sources.optical_model
python3 -m sedi.sources.branching_ratios
python3 -m sedi.sources.ckm_analysis

License

MIT

Links

• TECS-L — Theory (157+ discoveries)
• Paper: P-001 — σφ=nτ characterizations