40-class beta-range SSVEP speller dataset.
- Code: Kim2025BetaRange
- Paradigm: ssvep
- DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-06032-2
- Subjects: 40
- Sessions per subject: 6
- Events: 14=1, 15=2, 16=3, 17=4, 18=5, 19=6, 20=7, 21=8, 14.2=9, 15.2=10, 16.2=11, 17.2=12, 18.2=13, 19.2=14, 20.2=15, 21.2=16, 14.4=17, 15.4=18, 16.4=19, 17.4=20, 18.4=21, 19.4=22, 20.4=23, 21.4=24, 14.6=25, 15.6=26, 16.6=27, 17.6=28, 18.6=29, 19.6=30, 20.6=31, 21.6=32, 14.8=33, 15.8=34, 16.8=35, 17.8=36, 18.8=37, 19.8=38, 20.8=39, 21.8=40
- Trial interval: [0.0, 5.0] s
- File format: MAT
- Sampling rate: 1024.0 Hz
- Number of channels: 31
- Channel types: eeg=31, misc=2
- Montage: standard_1005
- Hardware: BioSemi ActiveTwo
- Software: OpenViBE
- Reference: CMS/DRL
- Ground: CMS/DRL near Pz
- Sensor type: active
- Line frequency: 60.0 Hz
- Impedance threshold: 5 kOhm
- Cap manufacturer: BioSemi
- Electrode type: wet
- Electrode material: Ag/AgCl
- Number of subjects: 40
- Health status: healthy
- Age: mean=22.8, std=3.34, min=20, max=35
- Gender distribution: male=25, female=15
- BCI experience: 3 of 40 had prior SSVEP-BCI experience
- Paradigm: ssvep
- Task type: speller
- Number of classes: 40
- Class labels: 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 14.2, 15.2, 16.2, 17.2, 18.2, 19.2, 20.2, 21.2, 14.4, 15.4, 16.4, 17.4, 18.4, 19.4, 20.4, 21.4, 14.6, 15.6, 16.6, 17.6, 18.6, 19.6, 20.6, 21.6, 14.8, 15.8, 16.8, 17.8, 18.8, 19.8, 20.8, 21.8
- Trial duration: 5.0 s
- Feedback type: none
- Stimulus type: JFPM visual flicker
- Stimulus modalities: visual
- Primary modality: visual
- Synchronicity: synchronous
- Mode: offline
- Training/test split: True
Schema: HED 8.4.0 | Browse: https://www.hedtags.org/hed-schema-browser
14
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/14
15
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/15
16
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/16
17
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/17
18
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/18
19
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/19
20
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/20
21
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/21
14.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/14_2
15.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/15_2
16.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/16_2
17.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/17_2
18.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/18_2
19.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/19_2
20.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/20_2
21.2
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/21_2
14.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/14_4
15.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/15_4
16.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/16_4
17.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/17_4
18.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/18_4
19.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/19_4
20.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/20_4
21.4
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/21_4
14.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/14_6
15.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/15_6
16.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/16_6
17.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/17_6
18.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/18_6
19.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/19_6
20.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/20_6
21.6
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/21_6
14.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/14_8
15.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/15_8
16.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/16_8
17.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/17_8
18.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/18_8
19.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/19_8
20.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/20_8
21.8
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Label/21_8
- Detected paradigm: ssvep
- Stimulus frequencies: [14.0, 14.2, 14.4, 14.6, 14.8, 15.0, 15.2, 15.4, 15.6, 15.8, 16.0, 16.2, 16.4, 16.6, 16.8, 17.0, 17.2, 17.4, 17.6, 17.8, 18.0, 18.2, 18.4, 18.6, 18.8, 19.0, 19.2, 19.4, 19.6, 19.8, 20.0, 20.2, 20.4, 20.6, 20.8, 21.0, 21.2, 21.4, 21.6, 21.8] Hz
- Frequency resolution: 0.2 Hz
- Trials: 240
- Blocks per session: 6
- Data state: epoched
- Classifiers: CCA, FBCCA, ITCCA, TRCA, EEGNet
- Feature extraction: CCA, FBCCA, TRCA
- Frequency bands: stimulus_range=[14.0, 22.0] Hz; analysis=[13.0, 89.0] Hz
- Spatial filters: CCA, TRCA
- Method: leave-one-subject-out
- Folds: 6
- Evaluation type: within_subject, cross_subject
- Applications: speller
- Environment: lab
- Pathology: healthy
- Modality: visual
- Type: perception
- DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-06032-2
- License: CC BY 4.0
- Investigators: Heegyu Kim, Kyungho Won, Minkyu Ahn, Sung Chan Jun
- Senior author: Sung Chan Jun
- Institution: Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
- Department: School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, GIST
- Country: KR
- Repository: Figshare
- Data URL: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28806815.v2
- Publication year: 2025
- Ethics approval: GIST IRB, No. 20211201-HR-64-02-04
- Keywords: SSVEP, BCI, beta range, visual fatigue, 40-class speller, JFPM, EEG
H. Kim, K. Won, M. Ahn, and S. C. Jun, "A 40-class SSVEP speller dataset: beta range stimulation for low-fatigue BCI applications," Scientific Data, vol. 12, p. 1751, 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-06032-2 Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Hochenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896
Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8
Generated by MOABB 1.4.3 (Mother of All BCI Benchmarks) https://github.com/NeuroTechX/moabb