Skip to content

Conversation

@evelinadanielsson
Copy link
Contributor

@evelinadanielsson evelinadanielsson commented Nov 24, 2025

Adding info about the behavior if a user with user auth provider is suspended.

Linear issue COPS-12

@evelinadanielsson evelinadanielsson force-pushed the dev-add-note-about-linked-usesrs-to-suspended-user-docs branch from 838a940 to 2b1e136 Compare November 24, 2025 08:26
@evelinadanielsson evelinadanielsson changed the title docs: add info about suspended status whit user auth providers docs: add info about suspended status whit user auth providers (COPS-12) Nov 24, 2025
@evelinadanielsson evelinadanielsson added the team-cypher-operations Cypher operations should review this label Nov 24, 2025
* Users who authenticate and authorize against an external ID provider (e.g., LDAP) can still log in.
If suspended while using Neo4j, they retain the roles and the privileges assigned by the external provider, including the `PUBLIC` role.
To prevent any of these, you need to use the mechanisms of their identity provider.
* Users who authenticate and authorize against an external ID provider and have xref:authentication-authorization/auth-providers.adoc[user auth providers] set up cannot log into Neo4j.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added it as another bullet point, another option would have been to have it in a NOTE block.

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Co-authored-by: Phil Wright <95368282+phil198@users.noreply.github.com>
@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Nov 27, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@evelinadanielsson evelinadanielsson merged commit ef1a74e into neo4j:dev Nov 27, 2025
6 checks passed
@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @evelinadanielsson, please don't merge the PRs before all the checks are green. Also, the docs team is responsible for merging them.

renetapopova added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
Cherry-picked from #2735

---------

Co-authored-by: evelinadanielsson <evelina.danielsson@neo4j.com>
Co-authored-by: Evelina Danielsson <evelina.danielsson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Phil Wright <95368282+phil198@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cherry-pick-this-to-main team-cypher-operations Cypher operations should review this

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants