Skip to content

Conversation

@JPryce-Aklundh
Copy link
Contributor

Corresponding PR (with more information) in Cypher Manual:
neo4j/docs-cypher#494

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like you've updated the documentation!

Check out your changes at https://neo4j-docs-operations-635.surge.sh

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @JPryce-Aklundh! All links look good to me. I haven't checked if there are any links that you've missed.

Copy link
Contributor

@davidoliverSP2 davidoliverSP2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This list looks complete, thanks @JPryce-Aklundh

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2023 08:11
JPryce-Aklundh added a commit to neo4j/docs-cypher that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2023
This PR collects the various administrative sections currently in Cypher
Manual and places them under a new chapter heading.
This includes:
- database management
- database alias management
- server management
- access control

Also included in PR:
- xref redirects

Corresponding PRs:
Operations Manual: neo4j/docs-operations#635
Cheat sheet: neo4j/docs-cheat-sheet#71

---------

Co-authored-by: JPryce-Aklundh <jpryce-aklundh@neo4j.com>
@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh merged commit 06ed547 into neo4j:dev Apr 4, 2023
@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh deleted the update_cypher_admin_links branch April 4, 2023 11:53
JPryce-Aklundh added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JPryce-Aklundh added a commit to JPryce-Aklundh/docs-operations that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants