[Doc refactor] - port old package-orchestration.md to new 2_concepts section#269
Conversation
…section
- mostly copy-paste
- cleaned up a lot of awkward wording
- new mentions of Package Revision and Package Variant concepts
- to keep it high-level:
- extract some deeper exploration of Package Orchestration concepts to
separate concepts_elaborated.md file
- remov deeper architecture descriptions of Porch Server, Function Runner,
and CaD Library to 5_architecture_&_components section
- they may be useful when we get to that section in depth
- fix "explination" typo across all files
content/en/docs/neo-porch/2_concepts/package_orchestration_concepts.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/docs/neo-porch/2_concepts/package_orchestration_concepts.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/docs/neo-porch/2_concepts/package_orchestration_concepts.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/docs/neo-porch/2_concepts/package_orchestration_concepts.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Adding light/dark mode themes to documentation as user prefers. Toggle Button is in the top right corner and can be viewed in preview. It should auto adjust to the users browser settings --------- Co-authored-by: JamesMcDermott <james.j.mcdermott@ericsson.com>
...neo-porch/5_architecture_&_components/relevant_old_docs/extracted_from_old_porch_concepts.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...neo-porch/5_architecture_&_components/relevant_old_docs/extracted_from_old_porch_concepts.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
✅ Deploy Preview for nephio ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
thank you for porting over to the main branch @JamesMcDermott sorry for the hassle |
- it's supposed to link to an overview document that isn't written yet
- ported config-as-data.md into theory from Overview section as it fits better - former porch_concepts/porch_concepts_elaborated structure removed - added blurb for Concepts section in _index.md
The relref syntax used previously was using the old shortcode in hugo and as such caused warnings at build stage these have been amended to use the up to date syntax. Secondly when using the correct relref syntax problems arise when hugo parses the "&" symbol in folder names and seems to ignore/nullify this symbol leading to failing build. rectified by renaming the folders and replacing any instance of "&" with "and"
…section
- mostly copy-paste
- cleaned up a lot of awkward wording
- new mentions of Package Revision and Package Variant concepts
- to keep it high-level:
- extract some deeper exploration of Package Orchestration concepts to
separate concepts_elaborated.md file
- remov deeper architecture descriptions of Porch Server, Function Runner,
and CaD Library to 5_architecture_&_components section
- they may be useful when we get to that section in depth
- fix "explination" typo across all files
- ported config-as-data.md into theory from Overview section as it fits better - former porch_concepts/porch_concepts_elaborated structure removed - added blurb for Concepts section in _index.md
- also rename two files to remove ampersands
- add descriptions to Hugo header elements in each doc to improve presentation in rendered site - copy rewrites of old config-as-data content back to the copies in relevant relevant_old_docs documents so as not to lose them - other minor tweaks from offline review comments
- port some last bits in from kpt documentation
|
/approve im happy with this becoming our new concepts section. |
| For additional ease of use, the PackageRevision resource type applies a Kubernetes label to the latest package revision | ||
| when read using the `porchctl` or `kubectl` CLI: `kpt.dev/latest-revision: "true"` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Package Relationships - Upstream and Downstream |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important but too low level for here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we move this to some other place or just delete them from here?
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Catalin-Stratulat-Ericsson, efiacor The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |



Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.